Alexandre Boyes Property Management Company — tribunal record
Alexandre Boyes Property Management Company appears in 5 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus, listed below with a link to each one. Outcome and reduction figures for this firm are being rebuilt on a classification that separates leaseholder challenges from landlord applications, and are not shown. (n=5, as of 30 July 2026)
About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.
Decisions in the corpus naming Alexandre Boyes Property Management Company
| Case reference | Decision date | Area | Our summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAV/21UH/LDC/2024/0636 | 4 April 2025 | RH18 | — |
| HAV/21UH/LDC/2024/0639 | 31 March 2025 | RH18 | — |
| LON/00AY/LDC/2023/0319 | 1 March 2024 | SW4 | — |
| CHI/29UQ/LDC/2021/0093 | 25 November 2021 | TN4 | — |
| CHI/29UQ/LDC/2021/0021 | 26 March 2021 | TN4 | — |
What tribunals have said
The passages below are quoted verbatim from published tribunal decisions in which Alexandre Boyes Property Management Company appears; each links to the full public decision on GOV.UK. We publish only the tribunal's own words — never our characterisation.
“The Applicant's representative has not treated these proceedings with the seriousness that they merit. The information supplied to the Tribunal to support the application has been minimal. For example the Applicant has not supplied details of the quotations, the programme of works and the steps that it has taken to ensure that the costs to the Respondents are not excessive.”
“This email did not confirm that the application and directions had been displayed in the common parts as required by the directions. Additionally, the email did not confirm that a brief statement with costings was sent to the Respondents. The Tribunal noted that there were no details of any costings given by the Applicant within their application.”
Methodology
These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 4,243 decisions covering 18,023 individually disputed items, last updated 30 July 2026.
Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.