Anthem Management Limited — tribunal record
Anthem Management Limited appears in 5 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus; across the 18 individually challenged items in those cases, 11.1% were reduced or disallowed by the tribunal. (n=5, as of 4 July 2026)
About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.
Median reduction by cost head where this firm was involved
| Cost head | Items with amounts (n) | Median reduction |
|---|---|---|
| Other charges | 6 | 0% |
| Administration charges | 1 | 100% |
Decisions in the corpus naming Anthem Management Limited
| Case reference | Decision date | Area | Our summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAV/29UE/LSC/2025/0709 | 11 June 2026 | CT16 | Summary |
| HAV/21UC/LDC/2025/0667 | 15 July 2025 | BN23 | — |
| LON/00AW/LDC/2025/0654 | 28 May 2025 | W11 | — |
| LON/00AN/LDC/2025/0604 | 27 March 2025 | W14 | — |
| LON/00AN/LDC/2025/0647 | 27 March 2025 | W14 | — |
What tribunals have said
The passages below are quoted verbatim from published tribunal decisions in which Anthem Management Limited appears; each links to the full public decision on GOV.UK. We publish only the tribunal's own words — never our characterisation.
“whilst we accept that the communication from the Respondent, their managing agent or their solicitors could have been more constructive in helping the Applicant understand at an earlier stage how the charges are calculated and apportioned”
Methodology
These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 2,383 decisions covering 12,898 individually disputed items, last updated 4 July 2026.
Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.