Austin Rees Ltd — tribunal record
Austin Rees Ltd appears in 9 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus, listed below with a link to each one. Outcome and reduction figures for this firm are being rebuilt on a classification that separates leaseholder challenges from landlord applications, and are not shown. (n=9, as of 30 July 2026)
About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.
Decisions in the corpus naming Austin Rees Ltd
| Case reference | Decision date | Area | Our summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAV/00ML/LDC/2025/0704 | 26 September 2025 | BN1 | — |
| HAV/00ML/LDC/2025/0698 | 17 September 2025 | BN1 | — |
| HAV/00ML/LDC/2025/0658 | 14 July 2025 | BN1 | — |
| HAV/00ML/LDC/2025/0620 | 7 April 2025 | BN3 | — |
| CHI/00ML/LUS/2024/0003 | 24 February 2025 | BN1 | — |
| HAV/00ML/LDC/2025/0601 | 30 January 2025 | BN3 | — |
| HAV/00ML/LDC/2024/0648 | 14 January 2025 | BN1 | — |
| CHI/00ML/LSC/2023/0036 | 8 August 2023 | BN3 | — |
| CHI/00ML/LDC/2021/0115 | 14 February 2022 | BN3 | — |
What tribunals have said
The passages below are quoted verbatim from published tribunal decisions in which Austin Rees Ltd appears; each links to the full public decision on GOV.UK. We publish only the tribunal's own words — never our characterisation.
“Surely, it is the duty of the managing agents to secure sufficient funds from the leaseholders for any major works.”
“The 'attached notice' referred to in the application was not attached to the email with the Application.”
Methodology
These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 4,243 decisions covering 18,023 individually disputed items, last updated 30 July 2026.
Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.