Broadlands Estate Management — tribunal record
Broadlands Estate Management appears in 5 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus, listed below with a link to each one. Outcome and reduction figures for this firm are being rebuilt on a classification that separates leaseholder challenges from landlord applications, and are not shown. (n=5, as of 30 July 2026)
About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.
Decisions in the corpus naming Broadlands Estate Management
| Case reference | Decision date | Area | Our summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| LON/00AG/LDC/2025/0700 | 6 February 2026 | NW6 | — |
| LON/00AL/LDC/2021/0053 | 2 August 2023 | SE10 | — |
| LON/00AG/LDC/2021/0206 | 11 October 2021 | NW6 | — |
| LON/00AP/LDC/2021/0052P | 10 May 2021 | N8 | — |
| CAM/22UD/LDC/2021/0007 | 21 April 2021 | CM14 | — |
What tribunals have said
The passages below are quoted verbatim from published tribunal decisions in which Broadlands Estate Management appears; each links to the full public decision on GOV.UK. We publish only the tribunal's own words — never our characterisation.
“the applicant/landlord should ensure that sufficient photographs of the subject property to show its nature should be included in any future applications to the Tribunal under section 20ZA.”
“The tribunal is aware that the bundle contains none of the following information namely, a detailed works justification, a description of the works or a confirmed cost quotation.”
Methodology
These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 4,243 decisions covering 18,023 individually disputed items, last updated 30 July 2026.
Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.