Encore — tribunal record
Encore appears in 11 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus, listed below with a link to each one. Outcome and reduction figures for this firm are being rebuilt on a classification that separates leaseholder challenges from landlord applications, and are not shown. (n=11, as of 30 July 2026)
About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.
Decisions in the corpus naming Encore
| Case reference | Decision date | Area | Our summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAV/00MR/LSC/2025/0778 | 19 June 2026 | PO1 | — |
| LON/00BK/LDC/2026/0037 | 29 April 2026 | SW1H | — |
| CAM/12UB/LDC/2025/0652 | 16 October 2025 | CB2 | — |
| CAM/12UB/LDC/2025/0631 | 27 June 2025 | CB1 | — |
| CAM/22UF/LDC/2025/0622 | 9 June 2025 | CM2 | — |
| CAM/12UB/LDC/2024/0016 | 17 January 2025 | CB1 | — |
| CAM/12UB/LBC/2023/0009 | 24 September 2024 | CB4 | — |
| LON/00BK/LDC/2023/0262 | 18 March 2024 | NW1 | — |
| CAM/12UB/LDC/2023/0061 | 30 January 2024 | CB1 | — |
| BIR/00FY/LDC/2021/0020 | 10 November 2021 | NG1 | — |
| BIR/00FY/LDC/2021/0021 | 10 November 2021 | NG7 | — |
What tribunals have said
The passages below are quoted verbatim from published tribunal decisions in which Encore appears; each links to the full public decision on GOV.UK. We publish only the tribunal's own words — never our characterisation.
“We do treat more significantly the late withdrawal of the claim of subletting under clause 4.4. It seems to us that this allegation had created a lot of paperwork in a case already overburdened with reams of material.”
“the Applicant chose to pursue an historic breach which was not likely to provide a case for forfeiture. Whilst the Applicant may have wished to have some form of precedent to wave at other persons in the building who act similarly to Mr Ingram, as this very case shows (based on the authorities cited to us) each case is a question of fact and degree, and must turn on its individual circumstances.”
Methodology
These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 4,243 decisions covering 18,023 individually disputed items, last updated 30 July 2026.
Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.