Tribunal Record

Fountayne Managing Ltd — tribunal record

Fountayne Managing Ltd appears in 5 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus; across the 104 individually challenged items in those cases, 11.5% were reduced or disallowed by the tribunal. (n=5, as of 4 July 2026)

About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.

Median reduction by cost head where this firm was involved

Cost headItems with amounts (n)Median reduction
Other charges250%
Repairs & maintenance160%
Cleaning110%
Utilities90%
Gardening & grounds70%
Buildings insurance40%
Management fees40%
Legal & professional costs40%
Major works10%

Decisions in the corpus naming Fountayne Managing Ltd

Case referenceDecision dateAreaOur summary
LON/00AR/LSC/2022/00041 November 2022RM7Summary
LON/00AZ/LSC/2021/00565 November 2021SE6Summary
LON/00AP/LSC/2021/004527 May 2021N17Summary
LON/00BB/LSC/2020/0174-AND-LON/00BB/LDC/2020/025822 January 2021E15Summary
CHI/29UN/LIS/2020/003830 November 2020CT9

What tribunals have said

The passages below are quoted verbatim from published tribunal decisions in which Fountayne Managing Ltd appears; each links to the full public decision on GOV.UK. We publish only the tribunal's own words — never our characterisation.

“The applicant has failed to disclose any invoices relating to the management fees, nor a copy of the management agreement.”
The tribunal in LON/00AR/LSC/2022/0004, of Applicant (London and Capital Housing Ltd / Fountayne Managing Ltd)

Methodology

These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 2,383 decisions covering 12,898 individually disputed items, last updated 4 July 2026.

Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.