HES Estate Management Ltd — tribunal record
HES Estate Management Ltd appears in 12 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus, listed below with a link to each one. Outcome and reduction figures for this firm are being rebuilt on a classification that separates leaseholder challenges from landlord applications, and are not shown. (n=12, as of 30 July 2026)
About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.
Decisions in the corpus naming HES Estate Management Ltd
| Case reference | Decision date | Area | Our summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAV/43UM/LDC/2026/0066 | 22 June 2026 | GU22 | — |
| HAV/43UB/LDC/2026/0006 | 5 March 2026 | KT13 | — |
| HAV/43UB/LDC/2025/0778 | 2 February 2026 | KT13 | — |
| HAV/43UC/LDC/2025/0755 | 20 January 2026 | KT19 | — |
| HAV/43UD/LDC/2025/0716 | 13 January 2026 | GU1 | — |
| HAV/43UF/LDC/2025/0688 | 9 September 2025 | SM7 | — |
| LON/00AX/LDC/2024/0169 | 4 March 2025 | KT3 | — |
| HAV/43UC/LDC/2024/0622 | 18 December 2024 | KT19 | — |
| CHI/43UC/LDC/2024/0080 | 1 July 2024 | KT18 | — |
| CHI/43UB/LDC/2024/0036 | 26 February 2024 | KT11 | — |
| CHI/43UE/LDC/2023/0115 | 26 October 2023 | KT22 | — |
| CHI/43UF/LSC/2022/0012 | 6 December 2022 | KT20 | Summary |
What tribunals have said
The passages below are quoted verbatim from published tribunal decisions in which HES Estate Management Ltd appears; each links to the full public decision on GOV.UK. We publish only the tribunal's own words — never our characterisation.
“In administering the service charge in that way, the Respondent has failed to comply with the reconciliation provisions contained in the Lease.”
“It may be a matter that they wish to consider remedying under Part IV of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987; but they have not done so despite such an application being canvassed in correspondence between the parties.”
Methodology
These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 4,243 decisions covering 18,023 individually disputed items, last updated 30 July 2026.
Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.