Homestead Consultancy Services Limited — tribunal record
Homestead Consultancy Services Limited appears in 6 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus, listed below with a link to each one. Outcome and reduction figures for this firm are being rebuilt on a classification that separates leaseholder challenges from landlord applications, and are not shown. (n=6, as of 30 July 2026)
About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.
Decisions in the corpus naming Homestead Consultancy Services Limited
| Case reference | Decision date | Area | Our summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAN/30UK/LSC/2024/0616 | 21 April 2026 | PR1 | — |
| MAN/30UK/LDC/2023/0053 | 28 March 2024 | PR1 | — |
| MAN/30UK/LDC/2022/0038 | 5 September 2023 | PR1 | — |
| MAN/30UF/LDC/2022/0046 | 2 May 2023 | FY6 | — |
| MAN/30UK/LDC/2022/0061 | 14 February 2023 | PR2 | — |
| MAN/30UK/LSC/2019/0107 | 3 March 2021 | PR2 | Summary |
What tribunals have said
The passages below are quoted verbatim from published tribunal decisions in which Homestead Consultancy Services Limited appears; each links to the full public decision on GOV.UK. We publish only the tribunal's own words — never our characterisation.
“It would appear difficulties experienced by the managing agents in ensuring correct service of the application upon the leaseholders may not have assisted that state of affairs.”
“It is conceivable that the Applicant and the managing agents may have been able to deal with the matter in a different way if steps had been taken earlier in relation to the proposals within the 2016 planning permission, but this is in no way clear on the evidence available to the Tribunal.”
Methodology
These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 4,243 decisions covering 18,023 individually disputed items, last updated 30 July 2026.
Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.