Kinleigh Folkard and Hayward — tribunal record
Kinleigh Folkard and Hayward appears in 5 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus; across the 26 individually challenged items in those cases, 61.5% were reduced or disallowed by the tribunal. (n=5, as of 4 July 2026)
About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.
Median reduction by cost head where this firm was involved
| Cost head | Items with amounts (n) | Median reduction |
|---|---|---|
| Other charges | 5 | 0% |
| Utilities | 4 | 5.5% |
Decisions in the corpus naming Kinleigh Folkard and Hayward
| Case reference | Decision date | Area | Our summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| LON/00BK/LDC/2021/0231 | 25 October 2021 | W2 | — |
| LON/00AZ/LDC/2021/0168 | 2 September 2021 | SE16 | — |
| LON/00BG/LDC/2020/0257 | 22 April 2021 | E1W | — |
| LON/00BE/LSC/2020/0192 | 16 April 2021 | SE16 | Summary |
| LON/00BD/LSC/2020/0315 & LON/00BD/LSC/2020/0333 | 25 February 2021 | KT8 | — |
Methodology
These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 2,383 decisions covering 12,898 individually disputed items, last updated 4 July 2026.
Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.