McCarthy & Stone Management Services — tribunal record
McCarthy & Stone Management Services appears in 5 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus; across the 5 individually challenged items in those cases, 0% were reduced or disallowed by the tribunal. (n=5, as of 4 July 2026)
About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.
Decisions in the corpus naming McCarthy & Stone Management Services
| Case reference | Decision date | Area | Our summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAN/00CJ/LDC/2025/0653 | 27 January 2026 | NE4 | — |
| CAM/22UH/LDC/2024/0611 | 13 February 2025 | CH5 | — |
| CHI/19UJ/LDC/2022/0070 | 18 October 2022 | DT4 | — |
| CHI/21UH/LDC/2022/0072 | 15 September 2022 | BN27 | — |
| CHI/00HB/LDC/2022/0062 | 30 August 2022 | BS16 | — |
What tribunals have said
The passages below are quoted verbatim from published tribunal decisions in which McCarthy & Stone Management Services appears; each links to the full public decision on GOV.UK. We publish only the tribunal's own words — never our characterisation.
“the Tribunal finds that the means of keeping the Respondents informed verbally through coffee mornings is appropriate but insufficient.”
Methodology
These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 2,383 decisions covering 12,898 individually disputed items, last updated 4 July 2026.
Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.