Tribunal Record

Michael Richards & Co — tribunal record

Michael Richards & Co appears in 7 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus; across the 13 individually challenged items in those cases, 30.8% were reduced or disallowed by the tribunal. (n=7, as of 4 July 2026)

About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.

Median reduction by cost head where this firm was involved

Cost headItems with amounts (n)Median reduction
Major works30%
Other charges20%
Management fees150%
Cleaning1100%
Utilities128.3%

Decisions in the corpus naming Michael Richards & Co

Case referenceDecision dateAreaOur summary
LON/00BA/LSC/2025/090012 April 2026SW19
LON/00AP/LDC/2024/01543 April 2025N17
LON/00AN/LSC/2023/041315 July 2024W14Summary
LON/00AH/LDC/2022/013613 March 2024SW16
LON/00AP/LDC/2022/02203 October 2023N4
LON/00AN/LDC/2023/004411 May 2023SW6
LON/00AP/LDC/2020/003625 January 2021N11

What tribunals have said

The passages below are quoted verbatim from published tribunal decisions in which Michael Richards & Co appears; each links to the full public decision on GOV.UK. We publish only the tribunal's own words — never our characterisation.

“This dispute could have been avoided if the Respondent had engaged more with the Applicants.”
The tribunal in LON/00AN/LSC/2023/0413, of Orchidbase Limited / Michael Richards & Co

Methodology

These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 2,383 decisions covering 12,898 individually disputed items, last updated 4 July 2026.

Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.