Oakfield PM Ltd — tribunal record
Oakfield PM Ltd appears in 6 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus; across the 20 individually challenged items in those cases, 15% were reduced or disallowed by the tribunal. (n=6, as of 4 July 2026)
About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.
Median reduction by cost head where this firm was involved
| Cost head | Items with amounts (n) | Median reduction |
|---|---|---|
| Major works | 1 | 100% |
Decisions in the corpus naming Oakfield PM Ltd
| Case reference | Decision date | Area | Our summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAV/21UG/LDC/2026/0039 | 23 April 2026 | TN40 | — |
| CHI/21UD/LSC/2024/0117 | 19 February 2026 | TN34 | — |
| HAV/21UD/LDC/2025/0751 | 8 January 2026 | TN38 | — |
| CHI/21UD/LDC/2024/0017 | 7 February 2024 | TN34 | — |
| CHI/21UG/LDC/2023/0028 | 6 April 2023 | TN40 | — |
| CHI/21UD/LDC/2020/0111 | 23 February 2021 | TN34 | — |
Methodology
These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 2,383 decisions covering 12,898 individually disputed items, last updated 4 July 2026.
Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.