Tribunal Record

Parkfords Property Management — tribunal record

Parkfords Property Management appears in 7 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus; across the 11 individually challenged items in those cases, 18.2% were reduced or disallowed by the tribunal. (n=7, as of 4 July 2026)

About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.

Median reduction by cost head where this firm was involved

Cost headItems with amounts (n)Median reduction
Buildings insurance30%
Other charges10%
Major works1100%

Decisions in the corpus naming Parkfords Property Management

Case referenceDecision dateAreaOur summary
LON/00AP/LDC/2023/026613 February 2024N10
LON/00BE/LSC/2022/02872 March 2023SE15
CHI/43UF/LDC/2022/004622 August 2022RH1
CHI/43UK/LIS/2021/004130 March 2022CR3
CHI/00ML/LDC/2021/00844 November 2021BN1
CHI/00ML/LDC/2020/010220 January 2021BN1
LON/00AJ/LDC/2020/0091-P15 September 2020W7

What tribunals have said

The passages below are quoted verbatim from published tribunal decisions in which Parkfords Property Management appears; each links to the full public decision on GOV.UK. We publish only the tribunal's own words — never our characterisation.

“To this extent, it is perhaps surprising that Parkfords did not progress the statutory consultation process after 16 October 2019. Had they done so, then consultation could have been completed and the wider scope of the proposed works commenced.”
The tribunal in LON/00AJ/LDC/2020/0091-P, of Parkfords (managing agent)

Methodology

These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 2,383 decisions covering 12,898 individually disputed items, last updated 4 July 2026.

Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.