Plymouth Block Management — tribunal record
Plymouth Block Management appears in 9 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus, listed below with a link to each one. Outcome and reduction figures for this firm are being rebuilt on a classification that separates leaseholder challenges from landlord applications, and are not shown. (n=9, as of 30 July 2026)
About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.
Decisions in the corpus naming Plymouth Block Management
| Case reference | Decision date | Area | Our summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAV/00HG/LDC/2026/0008 | 26 March 2026 | PL4 | — |
| CHI/00HE/LDC/2024/0088 | 6 January 2025 | PL13 | — |
| CHI/18UC/LSC/2024/0044 | 27 August 2024 | EX4 | — |
| CHI/00HN/LDC/2023/0121 | 7 December 2023 | BH7 | — |
| CHI/18UC/LDC/2023/0029 | 20 April 2023 | EX4 | — |
| CHI/00HG/LDC/2022/0082 | 28 October 2022 | PL4 | — |
| CHI/00HE/LDC/2021/0076 | 8 September 2021 | PL12 | — |
| CHI/21UC/LDC/2020/0105 | 18 March 2021 | BN21 | — |
| CHI/00HG/LDC/2020/0098 | 29 December 2020 | PL4 | — |
What tribunals have said
The passages below are quoted verbatim from published tribunal decisions in which Plymouth Block Management appears; each links to the full public decision on GOV.UK. We publish only the tribunal's own words — never our characterisation.
“No indication has been given to what may have become of the Management Company. I have some concern as to whether it continues, is the correct Applicant and needs dispensation.”
“I am also mindful that the Management Company has not been given notice of this application or received a copy of the Directions but I adopt the same approach to that issue, namely that I have nothing to suggest that the application ought not to be granted because the Management Company still exists and should have been served.”
“The Tribunal notes that the quotation does not appear to be attached.”
“The Tribunal comments that it would at the very least have expected the representative to have sent a copy of the fire risk assessment to all leaseholders as part of a first stage notice indicating that works will be required.”
“The report highlights the works are urgent, yet it seems to have taken some 5 months to obtain quotes.”
Methodology
These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 4,243 decisions covering 18,023 individually disputed items, last updated 30 July 2026.
Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.