Principia Estate & Asset Management — tribunal record
Principia Estate & Asset Management appears in 5 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus, listed below with a link to each one. Outcome and reduction figures for this firm are being rebuilt on a classification that separates leaseholder challenges from landlord applications, and are not shown. (n=5, as of 30 July 2026)
About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.
Decisions in the corpus naming Principia Estate & Asset Management
| Case reference | Decision date | Area | Our summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| LON/00AW/LDC/2024/0675 | 30 June 2025 | SW3 | — |
| LON/00BK/LSC/2024/0211 | 5 November 2024 | SW1X | Summary |
| LON/00AW/LDC/2024/0156 | 30 July 2024 | SW1X | — |
| LON/00AW/LDC/2023/0121 | 4 September 2023 | SW3 | — |
| LON/00BK/LSC/2020/0330 | 12 July 2021 | W1K | — |
What tribunals have said
The passages below are quoted verbatim from published tribunal decisions in which Principia Estate & Asset Management appears; each links to the full public decision on GOV.UK. We publish only the tribunal's own words — never our characterisation.
“The above statement by Mr Lambertucci turned out to be incorrect as it did not take into account the change brought about by the deed of variation/rectification.”
“It is not clear from the evidence before the Tribunal as to why the Applicant estimated communal electricity charges of £8,000, nor to what extent this includes sums due from previous years. There are invoices in the bundle but all of them relate to periods after the estimated expenditure was produced on 4 July 2022.”
Methodology
These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 4,243 decisions covering 18,023 individually disputed items, last updated 30 July 2026.
Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.