Pure Block Management Ltd — tribunal record
Pure Block Management Ltd appears in 5 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus, listed below with a link to each one. Outcome and reduction figures for this firm are being rebuilt on a classification that separates leaseholder challenges from landlord applications, and are not shown. (n=5, as of 30 July 2026)
About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.
Decisions in the corpus naming Pure Block Management Ltd
| Case reference | Decision date | Area | Our summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAN/00FB/LDC/2025/0620 | 12 January 2026 | HU16 | — |
| MAN/36UG/LDC/2025/0634 | 7 January 2026 | YO21 | — |
| MAN/00BY/LDC/2024/0606 | 19 December 2025 | YO1 | — |
| MAN/00FF/LDC/2025/0609 | 23 May 2025 | YO31 | — |
| MAN/00FB/LDC/2023/0028 | 9 August 2023 | HU16 | — |
What tribunals have said
The passages below are quoted verbatim from published tribunal decisions in which Pure Block Management Ltd appears; each links to the full public decision on GOV.UK. We publish only the tribunal's own words — never our characterisation.
“The contractor engaged to service the pumps had since 2022 only carried out electrical servicing, without attending to the mechanical/plumbing side. This is clearly a serious oversight, although based on the information before the Tribunal, it is not clear where, as between the contractor and the managing agent who instructed them, the fault lies.”
“The Tribunal acknowledges that the Applicant (or its managing agents) could arguably have managed the instruction to the previous servicing contractor more effectively. Had they done so, it is possible that the need for emergency repairs may have been averted.”
Methodology
These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 4,243 decisions covering 18,023 individually disputed items, last updated 30 July 2026.
Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.