Taylor Clarke Ltd — tribunal record
Taylor Clarke Ltd appears in 5 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus; across the 9 individually challenged items in those cases, 55.6% were reduced or disallowed by the tribunal. (n=5, as of 4 July 2026)
About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.
Median reduction by cost head where this firm was involved
| Cost head | Items with amounts (n) | Median reduction |
|---|---|---|
| Legal & professional costs | 4 | 100% |
| Other charges | 2 | -31.8% |
| Utilities | 2 | 11.7% |
Decisions in the corpus naming Taylor Clarke Ltd
| Case reference | Decision date | Area | Our summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| BIR/47UC/LIS/2022/0002 | 10 May 2022 | WR14 | — |
| BIR/47UC/LIS/2022/0005 | 10 May 2022 | WR14 | — |
| BIR/47UC/LIS/2020/0047 | 14 April 2021 | WR14 | — |
| BIR/47UC/LLD/2020/0004 | 14 April 2021 | WR14 | — |
| BIR/47UC/LDC/2020/0017 | 26 February 2021 | WR14 | — |
What tribunals have said
The passages below are quoted verbatim from published tribunal decisions in which Taylor Clarke Ltd appears; each links to the full public decision on GOV.UK. We publish only the tribunal's own words — never our characterisation.
“Unfortunately, The Respondent's Solicitor's letter of 30th September 2020, on page 153 of the Bundle, failed to provide this information, notwithstanding the previous correspondence from the Respondents dated 8th February 2020.”
Methodology
These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 2,383 decisions covering 12,898 individually disputed items, last updated 4 July 2026.
Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.