Decision summary

LON/00BK/LSC/2020/0375 & others — service charge decision

In LON/00BK/LSC/2020/0375 & others, decided 17 January 2022, the First-tier Tribunal considered 10 disputed service charge items at Flat 25 Dudley Court, Upper Berkeley Street, London W1H 5QA and found largely for the landlord: 0 items were reduced or disallowed. Full decision on GOV.UK below.

Property: Flat 25 Dudley Court, Upper Berkeley Street, London W1H 5QA
Decision date: 17 January 2022
Full decision: Read on GOV.UK

Managing agent named in the decision: HML (formerly Alan Foster & Associates).

What was challenged and what the tribunal decided

ItemDemandedAllowedOutcomeGrounds
Cleaning (2018-19)Allowed in full
Cleaning (2019-20)Allowed in full
Lifts (2018-19)Allowed in fullLeaseholder evidence insufficient
Lifts (2019-20)Allowed in fullLeaseholder evidence insufficient
Management fees (2018-19)Allowed in full
Management fees (2019-20)Allowed in full
Other charges (2018-19)£4,556.60£4,556.60Allowed in full
Other charges (2019-20)£3,937.44£3,937.44Allowed in full
Repairs & maintenance (2018-19)Allowed in fullLeaseholder evidence insufficient
Repairs & maintenance (2019-20)Allowed in full

Key passages (verbatim)

“cleaning was being done. None of the photographs show any litter or the existence of vermin and we were told that the cleaning took place regularly and we saw the cleaning invoices in respect thereof. Accordingly, we do not consider that the charges made in connection with cleaning are unreasonable and should be allowed.”
On cleaning
“we do not consider that the charges made in connection with cleaning are unreasonable and should be allowed”
On cleaning
“Mr Franzi rather over-egged the pudding as stating that the lifts were frequently not working as this was not borne out by any of the invoices which were produced, which showed the quarterly attendances and only a limited number of call outs.”
On lifts
“insofar as the lifts were concerned, we do feel that Mr Franzi rather over-egged the pudding”
On lifts
“The management charge is in accordance with the provision of the contract which was produced to us and of course the estimated charge is just that.”
On management fees
“The management charge is in accordance with the provision of the contract which was produced to us”
On management fees
“other than to express some surprise that there is nigh on quarter of a million pounds in the reserve fund account, which could perhaps have been utilised to deal with the state of repair of the common parts.”
Of Applicant / managing agent (regarding failure to use reserve fund for common area repairs)

This summary is assembled from the structured record of the published decision; amounts appear only where the tribunal stated them. Always rely on the full decision itself.