Carrick Johnson Management Services Ltd — tribunal record
Carrick Johnson Management Services Ltd appears in 10 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus, listed below with a link to each one. Outcome and reduction figures for this firm are being rebuilt on a classification that separates leaseholder challenges from landlord applications, and are not shown. (n=10, as of 12 August 2026)
About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.
Decisions in the corpus naming Carrick Johnson Management Services Ltd
| Case reference | Decision date | Area | Our summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHI/18UG/LDC/2023/0089 | 27 September 2023 | TQ9 | — |
| CHI/18UG/LDC/2023/0089/AW | 27 September 2023 | TQ9 | — |
| CHI/00HH/LSC/2022/0111 & CHI/00HH/LSC/2023/0008 | 26 June 2023 | TQ1 | — |
| CHI/18UG/LDC/2023/0020 | 6 April 2023 | TQ6 | — |
| CHI/00HH/LDC/2022/0001 | 3 February 2022 | TQ1 | — |
| CHI/18UH/LDC/2021/0082 | 21 October 2021 | TQ13 | — |
| CHI/00HN/LDC/2021/0049 | 24 June 2021 | TQ1 | — |
| CHI/00HH/LDC/2021/0030 | 28 April 2021 | TQ5 | — |
| CHI/18UG/LDC/2020/0106 | 18 February 2021 | TQ6 | — |
| CHI/00HH/LDC/2020/0114 | 21 January 2021 | TQ2 | — |
What tribunals have said
The passages below are quoted verbatim from published tribunal decisions in which Carrick Johnson Management Services Ltd appears; each links to the full public decision on GOV.UK. We publish only the tribunal's own words — never our characterisation.
“The Applicant has not indicated whether competitive quotations have been sought or given any reason why such a course has not been followed and in the absence of any submissions by the Applicant I propose to make dispensation conditional upon competitive quotations being obtained.”
“No response to this objection has been received from the Applicant.”
Methodology
These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 4,244 decisions covering 18,031 individually disputed items, last updated 12 August 2026.
Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.