Centrick Limited — tribunal record
Centrick Limited appears in 5 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus, listed below with a link to each one. Outcome and reduction figures for this firm are being rebuilt on a classification that separates leaseholder challenges from landlord applications, and are not shown. (n=5, as of 12 August 2026)
About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.
Decisions in the corpus naming Centrick Limited
| Case reference | Decision date | Area | Our summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| BIR/00CN/LSC/2025/0054 | 16 June 2026 | B3 | — |
| HAV/29UH/LIS/2025/0009 | 24 February 2026 | ME15 | Summary |
| CAM/00MD/LDC/2025/0644 | 27 January 2026 | SL2 | — |
| HAV/24UD/LSC/2024/0639 | 4 September 2025 | SO50 | — |
| CAM/38UF/LDC/2024/0610 | 6 May 2025 | OX16 | — |
What tribunals have said
The passages below are quoted verbatim from published tribunal decisions in which Centrick Limited appears; each links to the full public decision on GOV.UK. We publish only the tribunal's own words — never our characterisation.
“Mr. Martin criticised Centrick Limited for not clarifying the position and getting the works done earlier.”
“Mr. Martin told the Tribunal that the managing agents had also given misleading information to him and they had failed to answer clearly the queries which he raised.”
Methodology
These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 4,244 decisions covering 18,031 individually disputed items, last updated 12 August 2026.
Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.