Collinson Hall Ltd — tribunal record
Collinson Hall Ltd appears in 8 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus, listed below with a link to each one. Outcome and reduction figures for this firm are being rebuilt on a classification that separates leaseholder challenges from landlord applications, and are not shown. (n=8, as of 31 October 2026)
About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.
Decisions in the corpus naming Collinson Hall Ltd
| Case reference | Decision date | Area | Our summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAM/26UC/LDC/2026/0014 | 30 April 2026 | HP3 | — |
| CAM/26UG/LDC/2026/0010 | 22 April 2026 | AL1 | — |
| CAM/26UG/LDC/2025/0633 | 4 July 2025 | AL1 | — |
| CAM/26UG/LDC/2024/0033 | 29 January 2025 | AL1 | — |
| CAM/26UG/LDC/2024/0601 | 29 January 2025 | AL1 | — |
| CAM/26UG/LDC/2023/0059 | 26 January 2024 | AL1 | — |
| CAM/26UE/LDC/2023/0004 | 4 April 2023 | WD7 | — |
| CAM/26UJ/LDC/2022/0006 | 1 April 2022 | WD19 | — |
What tribunals have said
The passages below are quoted verbatim from published tribunal decisions in which Collinson Hall Ltd appears; each links to the full public decision on GOV.UK. We publish only the tribunal's own words — never our characterisation.
“Whilst it is arguable that this should have taken place the tribunal does not consider this is relevant to this application.”
“Given the application to this Tribunal was not made until 27 November 2023 it is not clear why there was a delay.”
“the Tribunal noted that the Applicant was directed to display a copy of the application and Tribunal Directions in a prominent position in the common parts of the Property and that confirmation that this has been completed has not been received from the Applicant.”
Methodology
These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 4,423 decisions covering 19,030 individually disputed items, last updated 31 October 2026.
Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.