Fountayne Managing Ltd — tribunal record
Fountayne Managing Ltd appears in 7 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus, listed below with a link to each one. Outcome and reduction figures for this firm are being rebuilt on a classification that separates leaseholder challenges from landlord applications, and are not shown. (n=7, as of 12 August 2026)
About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.
Decisions in the corpus naming Fountayne Managing Ltd
| Case reference | Decision date | Area | Our summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| LON/00BJ/LSC/2022/0074 & LON/00BJ/LDC/2022/0166 | 3 March 2023 | SW18 | — |
| LON/00AR/LSC/2022/0004 | 1 November 2022 | RM7 | Summary |
| LON/00AZ/LSC/2021/0056 | 5 November 2021 | SE6 | Summary |
| LON/00AP/LSC/2021/0045 | 27 May 2021 | N17 | Summary |
| LON/00BB/LSC/2020/0174-AND-LON/00BB/LDC/2020/0258 | 22 January 2021 | E15 | Summary |
| CHI/29UN/LIS/2020/0038 | 30 November 2020 | CT9 | — |
| CHI/29UN/LIS/2020/0039 | 30 November 2020 | CT9 | Summary |
What tribunals have said
The passages below are quoted verbatim from published tribunal decisions in which Fountayne Managing Ltd appears; each links to the full public decision on GOV.UK. We publish only the tribunal's own words — never our characterisation.
“The applicant has failed to disclose any invoices relating to the management fees, nor a copy of the management agreement.”
“No substantive reply was received. The Tribunal does not accept that the building only contains two flats.”
“it appears that as provided, this is incomplete. The applicant will therefore need to identify relevant disallowed invoices and agree the position with the respondent.”
Methodology
These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 4,244 decisions covering 18,031 individually disputed items, last updated 12 August 2026.
Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.