Tribunal Record

HML — tribunal record

HML appears in 10 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus, listed below with a link to each one. Outcome and reduction figures for this firm are being rebuilt on a classification that separates leaseholder challenges from landlord applications, and are not shown. (n=10, as of 9 September 2026)

About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.

Decisions in the corpus naming HML

Case referenceDecision dateAreaOur summary
CAM/12UE/LSC/2024/003025 July 2025PE19
LON/00AG/LSC/2025/068318 July 2025NW6
CAM/00KB/LIS/2023/002528 February 2025MK40
LON/00AF/LDC/2024/01279 September 2024BR1
LON/00BK/LSC/2023/02204 December 2023W2Summary
LON/00BJ/LSC/2022/02301 December 2022SW16Summary
LON/00AP/LDC/2021/02732 February 2022N6
LON/00BK/LSC/2020/0375-AND-LON/00BK/LSC/2021/0023-COSTS18 January 2022W1H
LON/00AM/LDC/2021/01283 September 2021E8
LON/00AK/LSC/2020/018015 July 2021N21

Methodology

These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 4,244 decisions covering 18,031 individually disputed items, last updated 9 September 2026.

Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.