HML PM Ltd — tribunal record
HML PM Ltd appears in 10 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus, listed below with a link to each one. Outcome and reduction figures for this firm are being rebuilt on a classification that separates leaseholder challenges from landlord applications, and are not shown. (n=10, as of 31 July 2026)
About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.
Decisions in the corpus naming HML PM Ltd
| Case reference | Decision date | Area | Our summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| LON/00BD/LSC/2025/0623 | 24 December 2025 | SW13 | Summary |
| HAV/24UG/LDC/2025/0686 | 21 November 2025 | RG27 | — |
| LON/00BA/LDC/2025/0624 | 21 October 2025 | CR4 | — |
| HAV/29UQ/LDC/2025/0604 | 31 March 2025 | TN2 | — |
| HAV/29UH/LDC/2024/0625 | 18 December 2024 | ME16 | — |
| LON/00AT/LDC/2024/0163 | 17 September 2024 | TW3 | — |
| LON/00AW/LSC/2023/0074 | 31 August 2023 | SW3 | — |
| CHI/00HA/LSC/2023/0020 | 10 August 2023 | BA1 | — |
| CHI/29UM/LSC/2023/0011 | 6 July 2023 | ME9 | — |
| CHI/43UM/LDC/2021/0043 | 14 June 2021 | GU22 | — |
What tribunals have said
The passages below are quoted verbatim from published tribunal decisions in which HML PM Ltd appears; each links to the full public decision on GOV.UK. We publish only the tribunal's own words — never our characterisation.
“It was an unusual feature of the case that the original statement of claim was based on a lease of a quite different property, apparently also managed by the HML.”
“We have no evidence or material from the property manager responsible for the indication of consent, nor, indeed, of the practices of the relevant team at HML at that time. There may simply have been an error.”
Methodology
These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 4,244 decisions covering 18,031 individually disputed items, last updated 31 July 2026.
Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.