Kingston Property Services Limited — tribunal record
Kingston Property Services Limited appears in 8 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus, listed below with a link to each one. Outcome and reduction figures for this firm are being rebuilt on a classification that separates leaseholder challenges from landlord applications, and are not shown. (n=8, as of 12 August 2026)
About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.
Decisions in the corpus naming Kingston Property Services Limited
| Case reference | Decision date | Area | Our summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAN/00CK/LSC/2024/0227 | 2 June 2025 | NE30 | — |
| MAN/00CH/LSC/2019/0095 | 21 October 2024 | NE9 | — |
| MAN/00EB/LSC/2022/0062 & 0065 | 26 May 2023 | TS24 | — |
| MAN/00CJ/LDC/2021/0087 | 11 November 2022 | NE1 | — |
| MAN/00CM/LSC/2020/0034 | 11 March 2022 | SR2 | Summary |
| MAN/00CK/LSC/2021/0010 | 17 October 2021 | NE12 | — |
| MAN/00CJ/LSC/2019/0037 | 31 January 2021 | NE3 | — |
| MAN/00EM/LDC/2019/0032 | 7 October 2019 | NE43 | — |
What tribunals have said
The passages below are quoted verbatim from published tribunal decisions in which Kingston Property Services Limited appears; each links to the full public decision on GOV.UK. We publish only the tribunal's own words — never our characterisation.
“The Tribunal found the Respondent to be somewhat opaque in its explanation of legal costs.”
Methodology
These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 4,244 decisions covering 18,031 individually disputed items, last updated 12 August 2026.
Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.