Michael Richards and Co — tribunal record
Michael Richards and Co appears in 17 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus, listed below with a link to each one. Outcome and reduction figures for this firm are being rebuilt on a classification that separates leaseholder challenges from landlord applications, and are not shown. (n=17, as of 12 August 2026)
About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.
Decisions in the corpus naming Michael Richards and Co
| Case reference | Decision date | Area | Our summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| LON/00BA/LSC/2025/0900 | 12 April 2026 | SW19 | — |
| LON/00AX/LDC/2024/0162 | 20 May 2025 | KT5 | — |
| LON/00AH/LDC/2024/0665 | 14 April 2025 | SW16 | — |
| LON/00AP/LDC/2024/0154 | 3 April 2025 | N17 | — |
| LON/00AP/LDC/2024/0662 | 31 March 2025 | N22 | — |
| LON/00AH/LDC/2024/0205 | 12 March 2025 | SE25 | — |
| LON/00AN/LSC/2023/0413 | 15 July 2024 | W14 | — |
| LON/00AY/LDC/2024/0058 | 15 May 2024 | SW2 | — |
| LON/00AN/LDC/2023/0312 | 18 March 2024 | SW6 | — |
| LON/00AH/LDC/2022/0136 | 13 March 2024 | SW16 | — |
| LON/00AH/LDC/2023/0290 | 13 March 2024 | SW16 | — |
| LON/00BE/LDC/2023/0071 | 22 November 2023 | SE22 | — |
| LON/00AP/LDC/2022/0220 | 3 October 2023 | N4 | — |
| LON/00AN/LDC/2023/0044 | 11 May 2023 | SW6 | — |
| LON/00AN/LDC/2022/0243 | 6 March 2023 | W14 | — |
| LON/00AG/LDC/2021/0243 | 9 November 2021 | NW2 | — |
| LON/00AP/LDC/2020/0036 | 25 January 2021 | N11 | — |
What tribunals have said
The passages below are quoted verbatim from published tribunal decisions in which Michael Richards and Co appears; each links to the full public decision on GOV.UK. We publish only the tribunal's own words — never our characterisation.
“The Applicant has not explained the delay in making this application.”
“the Tribunal was satisfied that the nature of the roof works were perhaps not as urgent as was stated by Michael Richards. That is not consistent with the approximately two-year delay that was incurred from the serving of the Notice of Intention in September 2020 to the actual works commencing on or about November 2022. The obvious point is that statutory consultation could and perhaps should have taken place during this period of time.”
“This dispute could have been avoided if the Respondent had engaged more with the Applicants.”
“no specific detail has been provided about this”
Methodology
These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 4,244 decisions covering 18,031 individually disputed items, last updated 12 August 2026.
Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.