Moreland Estate Management Limited — tribunal record
Moreland Estate Management Limited appears in 5 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus; across the 53 individually challenged items in those cases, 49.1% were reduced or disallowed by the tribunal. (n=5, as of 4 July 2026)
About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.
Median reduction by cost head where this firm was involved
| Cost head | Items with amounts (n) | Median reduction |
|---|---|---|
| Other charges | 16 | 0% |
| Buildings insurance | 8 | 0% |
| Utilities | 5 | 0% |
| Cleaning | 3 | 100% |
| Repairs & maintenance | 2 | 33.4% |
| Major works | 1 | 100% |
| Management fees | 1 | 2.9% |
| Legal & professional costs | 1 | 0% |
| Reserve fund contributions | 1 | 100% |
Decisions in the corpus naming Moreland Estate Management Limited
| Case reference | Decision date | Area | Our summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAM/12UC/LSC/2024/0023 | 24 March 2025 | CB6 | — |
| CAM/00MC/LIS/2023/0027 | 28 February 2025 | Eastern | Summary |
| LON/00AY/LSC/2021/0054 | 26 August 2021 | SW2 | Summary |
| CHI/18UK/LSC/2020/0131 | 8 April 2021 | EX39 | — |
| CAM/000KC/LSC/2020/0019 | 5 October 2020 | LU6 | Summary |
What tribunals have said
The passages below are quoted verbatim from published tribunal decisions in which Moreland Estate Management Limited appears; each links to the full public decision on GOV.UK. We publish only the tribunal's own words — never our characterisation.
“The Applicants have not been helped by the Respondent's lack of involvement. On 3rd July 2020 Mr Curran wrote to the agents, Moreland Estates, requesting information which would have given him a chance to have obtained a comparable cost for insuring the property. He received no response.”
“This seems to me to be generous, especially given the lack of involvement by the managing agents in these proceedings.”
“Although the email from the Respondent refers to an insurance police and a receipt for payment, neither have been disclosed to the Tribunal.”
Methodology
These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 2,383 decisions covering 12,898 individually disputed items, last updated 4 July 2026.
Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.