Oakfield P. M. Limited — tribunal record
Oakfield P. M. Limited appears in 10 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus, listed below with a link to each one. Outcome and reduction figures for this firm are being rebuilt on a classification that separates leaseholder challenges from landlord applications, and are not shown. (n=10, as of 31 July 2026)
About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.
Decisions in the corpus naming Oakfield P. M. Limited
| Case reference | Decision date | Area | Our summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAV/21UD/LDC/2025/0680 | 26 August 2025 | TN38 | — |
| HAV/21UC/LDC/2024/0606 | 17 December 2024 | BN20 | — |
| CHI/21UG/LDC/2023/0153 | 20 December 2023 | TN40 | — |
| CHI/21UG/LDC/2023/0096 | 29 September 2023 | TN39 | — |
| CHI/21UD/LDC/2023/0048 | 23 June 2023 | TN34 | — |
| CHI/21UG/LDC/2023/0035 | 17 April 2023 | TN40 | — |
| CHI/21UG/LDC/2021/0028 | 30 April 2021 | TN40 | — |
| CHI/21UD/LDC/2021/0032 | 21 April 2021 | TN34 | — |
| CHI/21UG/LDC/2021/0025 | 12 April 2021 | TN39 | — |
| CHI/21UD/LDC/2020/0104 | 20 January 2021 | TN34 | — |
What tribunals have said
The passages below are quoted verbatim from published tribunal decisions in which Oakfield P. M. Limited appears; each links to the full public decision on GOV.UK. We publish only the tribunal's own words — never our characterisation.
“the Tribunal is unclear as to why additional quotations were not sought between the date of Triac's quotation in March 2023 and the date of application to the Tribunal in August 2023 or, if additional quotations were sought, the outcome of such enquiries.”
Methodology
These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 4,244 decisions covering 18,031 individually disputed items, last updated 31 July 2026.
Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.