Parkfords Management Ltd — tribunal record
Parkfords Management Ltd appears in 10 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus, listed below with a link to each one. Outcome and reduction figures for this firm are being rebuilt on a classification that separates leaseholder challenges from landlord applications, and are not shown. (n=10, as of 27 September 2026)
About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.
Decisions in the corpus naming Parkfords Management Ltd
| Case reference | Decision date | Area | Our summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| LON/00AJ/LDC/2025/0795 | 20 October 2025 | W13 | — |
| CHI/29UQ/LDC/2024/0091 | 28 June 2024 | TN2 | — |
| LON/00AP/LDC/2023/0266 | 13 February 2024 | N10 | — |
| CHI/45UC/LDC/2023/0172 | 31 January 2024 | PO21 | — |
| LON/00AY/LDC/2023/0024 | 12 April 2023 | SE19 | — |
| LON/00BE/LSC/2022/0287 | 2 March 2023 | SE15 | — |
| LON/00BK/LDC/2022/0244 | 14 February 2023 | SW1W | — |
| CHI/43UF/LDC/2022/0046 | 22 August 2022 | RH1 | — |
| LON/00AY/LDC/2021/0032 | 20 April 2021 | SE19 | — |
| LON/00BK/LDC/2020/0241 | 8 February 2021 | SW1W | — |
What tribunals have said
The passages below are quoted verbatim from published tribunal decisions in which Parkfords Management Ltd appears; each links to the full public decision on GOV.UK. We publish only the tribunal's own words — never our characterisation.
“The statement of reasons is somewhat confusing as Ms Fey appears to indicate she represents the respondents (the leaseholders) but we assume that to be a typographical error and that she has submitted the statement on behalf of the Applicant.”
“This sets out the issues relating to flat 1, especially the damage being caused to that property and the need for urgency but does not really expand on what is intended, presumably that being determined once the investigation has been completed.”
Methodology
These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 4,244 decisions covering 18,031 individually disputed items, last updated 27 September 2026.
Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.