Tribunal Record

Parkfords Management Ltd — tribunal record

Parkfords Management Ltd appears in 10 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus, listed below with a link to each one. Outcome and reduction figures for this firm are being rebuilt on a classification that separates leaseholder challenges from landlord applications, and are not shown. (n=10, as of 12 August 2026)

About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.

Decisions in the corpus naming Parkfords Management Ltd

Case referenceDecision dateAreaOur summary
LON/00AJ/LDC/2025/079520 October 2025W13
CHI/29UQ/LDC/2024/009128 June 2024TN2
LON/00AP/LDC/2023/026613 February 2024N10
CHI/45UC/LDC/2023/017231 January 2024PO21
LON/00AY/LDC/2023/002412 April 2023SE19
LON/00BE/LSC/2022/02872 March 2023SE15
LON/00BK/LDC/2022/024414 February 2023SW1W
CHI/43UF/LDC/2022/004622 August 2022RH1
LON/00AY/LDC/2021/003220 April 2021SE19
LON/00BK/LDC/2020/02418 February 2021SW1W

What tribunals have said

The passages below are quoted verbatim from published tribunal decisions in which Parkfords Management Ltd appears; each links to the full public decision on GOV.UK. We publish only the tribunal's own words — never our characterisation.

“The statement of reasons is somewhat confusing as Ms Fey appears to indicate she represents the respondents (the leaseholders) but we assume that to be a typographical error and that she has submitted the statement on behalf of the Applicant.”
The tribunal in LON/00BK/LDC/2022/0244, of Parkfords Management Limited / Shelley Fey
“This sets out the issues relating to flat 1, especially the damage being caused to that property and the need for urgency but does not really expand on what is intended, presumably that being determined once the investigation has been completed.”
The tribunal in LON/00BK/LDC/2022/0244, of Parkfords Management Limited / Shelley Fey

Methodology

These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 4,244 decisions covering 18,031 individually disputed items, last updated 12 August 2026.

Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.