Ringley Limited — tribunal record
Ringley Limited appears in 8 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus, listed below with a link to each one. Outcome and reduction figures for this firm are being rebuilt on a classification that separates leaseholder challenges from landlord applications, and are not shown. (n=8, as of 12 August 2026)
About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.
Decisions in the corpus naming Ringley Limited
| Case reference | Decision date | Area | Our summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| LON/00AS/LSC/2025/0614 | 30 January 2026 | UB8 | Summary |
| LON/00AG/LDC/2024/0090 | 20 November 2024 | London | — |
| LON/00AG/LDC/2024/0189 | 28 October 2024 | SW7 | — |
| LON/00AH/LDC/2024/0089 | 27 June 2024 | SE25 | — |
| LON/00BH/LDC/2023/0274 | 23 January 2024 | E4 | — |
| LON/00AW/LDC/2023/0151 | 16 January 2024 | SW7 | — |
| LON/00AH/LSC/2021/0388 | 27 July 2022 | SE25 | — |
| LON/00AX/LDC/2021/0014 | 6 April 2021 | KT1 | — |
What tribunals have said
The passages below are quoted verbatim from published tribunal decisions in which Ringley Limited appears; each links to the full public decision on GOV.UK. We publish only the tribunal's own words — never our characterisation.
“Neither any replies, nor confirmation that there were none was provided in the bundle; however, following a request for clarification from the Tribunal dated 21 June 2024 the applicant confirmed, in an email dated 24 June 2024, that no such replies had been received.”
“The tribunal accepts the respondent was treated unfavourably in relation to these repair costs. The applicant should have reimbursed 80% of these costs, or applied credits to his service charge account, when presented with these invoices.”
Methodology
These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 4,244 decisions covering 18,031 individually disputed items, last updated 12 August 2026.
Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.