TLC Estate Agents (Sean Stock) — tribunal record
TLC Estate Agents (Sean Stock) appears in 11 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus, listed below with a link to each one. Outcome and reduction figures for this firm are being rebuilt on a classification that separates leaseholder challenges from landlord applications, and are not shown. (n=11, as of 27 September 2026)
About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.
Decisions in the corpus naming TLC Estate Agents (Sean Stock)
| Case reference | Decision date | Area | Our summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| LON/00AW/LDC/2023/0287 | 15 July 2024 | SW5 | — |
| LON/00AW/LDC/2023/0156 | 25 September 2023 | SW7 | — |
| LON/00AW/LDC/2023/0025 | 16 May 2023 | SW5 | — |
| LON/00AW/LDC/2022/0223 | 15 May 2023 | W6 | — |
| LON/00AW/LDC/2022/0056 | 20 June 2022 | SW5 | — |
| LON/00AW/LSC/2021/0024, LON/00AW/LSC/2021/0129, LON/00AW/LSC/2021/0315 | 19 April 2022 | SW5 | — |
| LON/00AW/LDC/2021/0186 | 5 October 2021 | SW5 | — |
| LON/00AW/LDC/2021/0154 | 29 September 2021 | SW10 | — |
| LON/00AW/LDC/2021/0103 | 6 July 2021 | SW5 | — |
| LON/00AW/LDC/2021/0068 | 30 June 2021 | W11 | — |
| LON/00AN/LDC/2021/0050 | 10 May 2021 | W14 | — |
What tribunals have said
The passages below are quoted verbatim from published tribunal decisions in which TLC Estate Agents (Sean Stock) appears; each links to the full public decision on GOV.UK. We publish only the tribunal's own words — never our characterisation.
“The tribunal finds that the use of the heading 'Reserve Fund/sinking Fund' has been misleading and its renaming to Section 20 Levy more accurately reflects what the sum represents namely charges incurred by TLC in respect of managing major works including the service of notices.”
Methodology
These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 4,244 decisions covering 18,031 individually disputed items, last updated 27 September 2026.
Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.