Watson Property Management — tribunal record
Watson Property Management appears in 5 published First-tier Tribunal service charge decisions in our corpus, listed below with a link to each one. Outcome and reduction figures for this firm are being rebuilt on a classification that separates leaseholder challenges from landlord applications, and are not shown. (n=5, as of 31 October 2026)
About these figures: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.
Decisions in the corpus naming Watson Property Management
| Case reference | Decision date | Area | Our summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAN/00DA/LDC/2026/0032 | 23 July 2026 | LS1 | — |
| MAN/00DA/LDC/2022/0019 | 6 February 2023 | LS4 | — |
| MAN/00FF/LDC/2022/0041 | 25 October 2022 | YO10 | — |
| MAN/00DA/LDC/2022/0026 | 12 September 2022 | LS22 | — |
| MAN/00CY/LSC/2019/0102 | 17 January 2021 | HD6 | Summary |
What tribunals have said
The passages below are quoted verbatim from published tribunal decisions in which Watson Property Management appears; each links to the full public decision on GOV.UK. We publish only the tribunal's own words — never our characterisation.
“The objections primarily contend that the Works were foreseeable, that consultation could and should have been undertaken, that leaseholders were deprived of the opportunity to nominate contractors or comment on estimates, and that there was insufficient transparency concerning the procurement process and overall cost of the parcel locker installation. The Tribunal accepts that consultation did not take place and that the Respondents were therefore deprived of the procedural rights ordinarily afforded by section 20.”
Methodology
These statistics are computed from the published decisions of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) in service charge cases (case types LSC, LIS and LDC). Each decision is parsed into a structured record — the sums challenged, the sums allowed, the outcome per cost head, and the orders made — and the aggregates on this page are recomputed nightly in plain arithmetic from those records. No figure on this page is estimated, modelled or hand-typed; each carries its sample size. Current corpus: 4,423 decisions covering 19,030 individually disputed items, last updated 31 October 2026.
Read this before quoting: Outcomes reflect disputes that reached the First-tier Tribunal, not portfolio-wide quality. Small samples are noisy; every figure links to the underlying decisions.