Decision summary

BIR/00FY/LIS/2022/0032 — service charge decision

In BIR/00FY/LIS/2022/0032, decided 23 February 2026, the First-tier Tribunal considered 34 disputed service charge items at Flats G04, 220, 305, 307, 317 and 318 Avalon Court, Kent Street, Nottingham and reached a mixed result: 28 items were reduced or disallowed. Full decision on GOV.UK below.

Property: Flats G04, 220, 305, 307, 317 and 318 Avalon Court, Kent Street, Nottingham
Decision date: 23 February 2026
Full decision: Read on GOV.UK

Managing agent named in the decision: Xenia Estates Limited.

What was challenged and what the tribunal decided

ItemDemandedAllowedOutcomeGrounds
Utilities (2017-18)ReducedNo Section 20 consultation
Utilities (2018-19)ReducedNo Section 20 consultation
Utilities (2019-20)ReducedNo Section 20 consultation
Utilities (2020-21)ReducedNo Section 20 consultation
Utilities (2021-22)£60,234Allowed in full
Utilities (2017-18)£9,424.22ReducedLeaseholder evidence insufficient
Utilities (2018-19)£9,145Allowed in full
Utilities (2019-20)£7,416Allowed in full
Utilities (2020-21)£4,356.02ReducedCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a))
Utilities (2021-22)£6,586Allowed in full
Utilities (2017-18)£8,509.88ReducedDuplication of charges
Repairs & maintenance (2017-18)£5,199.39ReducedNot payable under the lease, Duplication of charges
Repairs & maintenance (2018-19)£22,303.97ReducedNot payable under the lease
Repairs & maintenance (2019-20)£10,775.94ReducedNot payable under the lease
Repairs & maintenance (2020-21)£3,962.51ReducedNot payable under the lease
Repairs & maintenance (2021-22)£3,087.59ReducedNot payable under the lease
Cleaning (2017-18)£22,385.60ReducedNot payable under the lease
Cleaning (2018-19)£4,215ReducedNot payable under the lease
Other charges (2018-19)£31,646Allowed in full
Lifts (2019-20)£230ReducedDuplication of charges
Lifts (2020-21)£2,529ReducedDuplication of charges
Other charges (2017-18)£3,340Allowed in full
Other charges (2018-19)£9,666ReducedNot payable under the lease
Other charges (2019-20)£3,069Reduced
Staffing & concierge (2020-21)£40,466ReducedNot payable under the lease, Costs unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a))
Staffing & concierge (2021-22)£61,369ReducedNot payable under the lease, Costs unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a))
Management fees (2017-18)£21,000ReducedFee excessive for service delivered, No Section 20 consultation, Standard not reasonable (s19(1)(b))
Management fees (2018-19)£21,000ReducedFee excessive for service delivered, No Section 20 consultation, Standard not reasonable (s19(1)(b))
Management fees (2019-20)£21,000ReducedFee excessive for service delivered, No Section 20 consultation, Standard not reasonable (s19(1)(b))
Management fees (2020-21)£21,000ReducedFee excessive for service delivered, No Section 20 consultation, Standard not reasonable (s19(1)(b))
Management fees (2021-22)£23,245.60ReducedFee excessive for service delivered, No Section 20 consultation, Standard not reasonable (s19(1)(b))
Other charges (2017-18)£0Disallowed entirelySection 20B 18-month time limit
Other charges (2018-19)£0Disallowed entirelySection 20B 18-month time limit
Other charges (2019-20)£0Disallowed entirelySection 20B 18-month time limit

Section 20C order: granted.

Key passages (verbatim)

“for the service charge years 2018/19 and 2019/20 the relevant contribution of each leaseholder towards electricity was limited to £100.00 per service charge year.”
On utilities
“for the service charge years 2018/19 and 2019/20 the relevant contribution of each leaseholder towards electricity was limited to £100.00 per service charge year.”
On utilities
“for the service charge years 2018/19 and 2019/20 the relevant contribution of each leaseholder towards electricity was limited to £100.00 per service charge year.”
On utilities
“in addition to the £100.00 capped amount per leaseholder, an additional amount of £3,908.63 … was payable from 9 January 2021 to 31 January 2021 and £20,696.22 was payable from 1 February 2021 to 31 August 2021, amounting to an additional figure payable of £24,604.85.”
On utilities
“the Tribunal found that there was insufficient evidence to suggest that the rates were not reasonable and that the full amount of £60,234.00 was payable.”
On utilities
“The Tribunal found that the amount payable was £9,424.22.”
On utilities

This summary is assembled from the structured record of the published decision; amounts appear only where the tribunal stated them. Always rely on the full decision itself.