Decision summary

BIR/00GA/LIS/2023/0040 — service charge decision

In BIR/00GA/LIS/2023/0040, decided 20 June 2024, the First-tier Tribunal considered 4 disputed service charge items at Flat 4, Gwynne Gate, Catherine Street, Hereford, HR1 2ED and reached a mixed result: 4 items were reduced or disallowed. Full decision on GOV.UK below.

Property: Flat 4, Gwynne Gate, Catherine Street, Hereford, HR1 2ED
Decision date: 20 June 2024
Full decision: Read on GOV.UK

Managing agent named in the decision: Mr Michael Williams (Company Secretary).

What was challenged and what the tribunal decided

ItemDemandedAllowedOutcomeGrounds
Repairs & maintenance (2020-21)£2,900£1,200ReducedCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a))
Other charges (2020-21)£725£625ReducedCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a))
Other charges (2021-22)£725£625ReducedCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a))
Other charges (2022-23)£725£625ReducedCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a))

Section 20C order: granted.

Key passages (verbatim)

“the Tribunal finds the reasonable cost of the work to have been £1,200 (One Thousand Two Hundred Pounds) including paint in 2021, rather than the £2,900 paid by the Freeholder.”
On repairs & maintenance
“the Tribunal therefore deducts £100 from the new service charge of £725 p.a. per flat as the other items comprising the service charge were not disputed, and assesses the service charges for years ending 30 June 2021, 2022 and 2023 at £625 p.a.”
On other charges
“assesses the service charges for years ending 30 June 2021, 2022 and 2023 at £625 p.a.”
On other charges
“assesses the service charges for years ending 30 June 2021, 2022 and 2023 at £625 p.a.”
On other charges
“During the Tribunal discussion Mr Williams said the £780 paid to the sub-contractor would have excluded paint. He said the Freeholder may have been over-charged, however the work needed to be carried out and it was too late to object.”
Of Respondent / Freeholder

This summary is assembled from the structured record of the published decision; amounts appear only where the tribunal stated them. Always rely on the full decision itself.