Decision summary

BIR/41UE/LSC/2020/0005 — service charge decision

In BIR/41UE/LSC/2020/0005, decided 18 December 2020, the First-tier Tribunal considered 5 disputed service charge items at Tower Court/Trinity Court/Windsor Court, No 1 London Road, Newcastle-under-Lyme and reached a mixed result: 4 items were reduced or disallowed. Full decision on GOV.UK below.

Property: Tower Court/Trinity Court/Windsor Court, No 1 London Road, Newcastle-under-Lyme
Decision date: 18 December 2020
Full decision: Read on GOV.UK

Managing agent named in the decision: Ian Hollins / Clear Building Management.

What was challenged and what the tribunal decided

ItemDemandedAllowedOutcomeGrounds
Buildings insurance (2020-21)£317,163.19£317,163.19Allowed in full—
Other charges (2020-21)—£67,233.60ReducedWorks not necessary, Other grounds
Other charges (2020-21)£67,500—Disallowed entirelyNo Section 20 consultation, Other grounds
Legal & professional costs (2020-21)£55,351.10—Disallowed entirelyLandlord could not evidence the cost, Other grounds
Other charges (2020-21)——Disallowed entirelyNot payable under the lease, Other grounds

Key passages (verbatim)

“the total insurance premiums of £317,163.19 cannot be regarded as unreasonable... the sum of £317,163.19 is payable by the Respondents (in the proportions set out in the leases).”
On buildings insurance
“it would be reasonable for Mr Hollins to incur costs up to £67,233.60 (29 weeks from 16 September 2020 to 31 March 2021 at £2,318.40 per week).”
On other charges
“it would be inappropriate at this stage to make any determination as to the reasonableness and payability of the costs claimed by Mr Hollins.”
On other charges
“given the absence of a detailed breakdown of the listed fees, the Tribunal is of the view that a determination on the reasonableness and payability of those fees should await any challenge to the certified service charge costs for 2020/2021.”
On legal & professional costs
“such a direction would permit Mr Hollins to incur and recover as yet unquantified costs and to bypass the statutory and contractual restrictions on their recoverability. The Tribunal cannot make such a direction.”
On other charges
“such a direction would permit Mr Hollins to incur and recover as yet unquantified costs and to bypass the statutory and contractual restrictions on their recoverability. The Tribunal cannot make such a direction.”
Of Ian Hollins (Applicant manager)
“given the absence of a detailed breakdown of the listed fees, the Tribunal is of the view that a determination on the reasonableness and payability of those fees should await any challenge to the certified service charge costs for 2020/2021.”
Of Ian Hollins (Applicant manager) — professional fees claim

This summary is assembled from the structured record of the published decision; amounts appear only where the tribunal stated them. Always rely on the full decision itself.