Decision summary

BIR/44UB/LIS/2023/0002 — service charge decision

In BIR/44UB/LIS/2023/0002, decided 21 November 2023, the First-tier Tribunal considered 39 disputed service charge items at Charles Wills Court, Coleshill Road, Atherstone CV9 1BT and reached a mixed result: 21 items were reduced or disallowed. Full decision on GOV.UK below.

Property: Charles Wills Court, Coleshill Road, Atherstone CV9 1BT
Decision date: 21 November 2023
Full decision: Read on GOV.UK

Managing agent named in the decision: Gateway Property Management Ltd.

What was challenged and what the tribunal decided

ItemDemandedAllowedOutcomeGrounds
Other charges (2019)£684£600ReducedCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a))
Management fees (2019)£5,091£2,520ReducedFee excessive for service delivered
Management fees (2020)£5,396£2,520ReducedFee excessive for service delivered
Management fees (2021)£2,592£2,592Allowed in full
Management fees (2022)£2,592£2,592Allowed in full
Other charges (2019)£342£288ReducedCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a))
Other charges (2020)£360£288ReducedCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a))
Other charges (2021)£360£288ReducedCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a))
Other charges (2022)£432£288ReducedCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a))
Administration charges (2019)£379£0Disallowed entirelyCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a))
Administration charges (2020)£216£0Disallowed entirelyCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a))
Legal & professional costs (2019)£1,200£1,200Allowed in full
Utilities (2019)£5,425£5,425Allowed in full
Utilities (2020)£-7,277£-7,277Allowed in full
Utilities (2021)£-361£-361Allowed in full
Utilities (2022)£597£597Allowed in full
Repairs & maintenance (2019)£180£180Allowed in full
Repairs & maintenance (2019)£156£0Disallowed entirelyCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a)), Duplication of charges
Repairs & maintenance (2020)£1,032£1,132Allowed in full
Repairs & maintenance (2021)£420£0Disallowed entirelyCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a))
Buildings insurance (2019)£2,928£2,928Allowed in full
Buildings insurance (2020)£3,160£3,160Allowed in full
Buildings insurance (2021)£3,455£3,455Allowed in full
Buildings insurance (2022)£3,806£3,806Allowed in full
Other charges (2019)£756£636ReducedCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a))
Other charges (2020)£780£650ReducedCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a))
Other charges (2021)£803£670ReducedCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a))
Other charges (2022)£827£690ReducedCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a))
Repairs & maintenance (2019)£330£165ReducedCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a))
Repairs & maintenance (2019)£144£40ReducedCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a)), Works not necessary
Repairs & maintenance (2020)£348£0Disallowed entirelyCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a))
Other charges (2020)Allowed in full
Other charges (2020)£120£0Disallowed entirelyCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a))
Repairs & maintenance (2021)£300£250ReducedCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a))
Other charges (2021)£432£432Allowed in full
Repairs & maintenance (2022)£1,164£1,164Allowed in full
Repairs & maintenance (2022)£180£180Allowed in full
Repairs & maintenance (2022)£343.20£150ReducedCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a)), Works not necessary
Other charges (2023)£15,005£15,005Allowed in full

Key passages (verbatim)

“The parties agreed that this annual cost would be reduced to £600.00.”
On other charges
“Mrs Coleman agreed to limit management fees to £175.00 plus VAT per flat for 2019 and 2020 (i.e., £2,520 per annum).”
On management fees
“Mrs Coleman agreed to limit management fees to £175.00 plus VAT per flat for 2019 and 2020 (i.e., £2,520 per annum).”
On management fees
“The Applicants did not challenge the management fees for 2021 and 2022 at £180.00 plus VAT (i.e., £2,592 per annum).”
On management fees
“The Applicants did not challenge the management fees for 2021 and 2022 at £180.00 plus VAT (i.e., £2,592 per annum).”
On management fees
“Mrs Coleman conceded that, so limiting the annual charge to £288.00 for the years in dispute.”
On other charges

This summary is assembled from the structured record of the published decision; amounts appear only where the tribunal stated them. Always rely on the full decision itself.