Decision summary

HAV/21UD/LSC/2025/0626 — service charge decision

In HAV/21UD/LSC/2025/0626, decided 7 April 2026, the First-tier Tribunal considered 13 disputed service charge items at Flat 5, 106 Braybrooke Road, Hastings, East Sussex and reached a mixed result: 4 items were reduced or disallowed. Full decision on GOV.UK below.

Property: Flat 5, 106 Braybrooke Road, Hastings, East Sussex
Decision date: 7 April 2026
Full decision: Read on GOV.UK

Managing agent named in the decision: Sussex Independent Financial Advisers Limited.

What was challenged and what the tribunal decided

ItemDemandedAllowedOutcomeGrounds
Other charges (2022)£610.20£610.20Allowed in full—
Utilities (2023)£196.68£196.68Allowed in full—
Other charges (2023)£538.30£538.30Allowed in full—
Major works (2023)£650.17£0Disallowed entirelyNot payable under the lease
Other charges (2023)£132£132Allowed in full—
Ground-rent-adjacent charges (2023)£100—Disallowed entirely—
Other charges (2023)£124.52£124.52Allowed in full—
Other charges (2023)£128.87£0conceded—
Other charges (2023)£150£0Disallowed entirelyNot payable under the lease
Administration charges (2024)£150£0Disallowed entirelyNot payable under the lease
Cleaning (2022)——Allowed in full—
Utilities (2022)——Allowed in full—
Management fees (2022)——Allowed in full—

Section 20C order: partial.

Key passages (verbatim)

“half year maintenance – payable”
On other charges
“emergency lighting – payable”
On utilities
“Fire alarms Pyrotec – payable”
On other charges
“Fire doors to individual flats – not payable”
On major works
“not in bundle but fuse board related – payable”
On other charges
“ground rent – no jurisdiction”
On ground-rent-adjacent charges
“The applicant did not set out a clear statement of case. Her application form listed invoices allegedly not received. Many were missing from the bundle.”
Of Applicant

This summary is assembled from the structured record of the published decision; amounts appear only where the tribunal stated them. Always rely on the full decision itself.