Decision summary

LON/00AR/LSC/2025/0734 — service charge decision

In LON/00AR/LSC/2025/0734, decided 24 October 2025, the First-tier Tribunal considered 7 disputed service charge items at Flat 40, Malt House Place, High Street, Romford, Essex and found largely for the landlord: 0 items were reduced or disallowed. Full decision on GOV.UK below.

Property: Flat 40, Malt House Place, High Street, Romford, Essex
Decision date: 24 October 2025
Full decision: Read on GOV.UK

Managing agent named in the decision: HML Group.

What was challenged and what the tribunal decided

ItemDemandedAllowedOutcomeGrounds
Reserve fund contributions (2021/2022)£6,733.25£6,733.25Allowed in full
Reserve fund contributions (2022/2023)£9,074.18£9,074.18Allowed in full
Reserve fund contributions (2022/2023)£3,810.20£3,810.20Allowed in full
Reserve fund contributions (2023/2024)£3,810.20£3,810.20Allowed in full
Reserve fund contributions (2023/2024)£203.51£203.51Allowed in full
Legal & professional costs (2022-2024)Allowed in full
Cleaning (2021-2025)£1,472£1,472Allowed in full

Section 20C order: refused.

Key passages (verbatim)

“The Tribunal finds the collection of service charge for future works lawful, and the absence of challenge on the amount, the amount collected is reasonable.”
On reserve fund contributions
“The Tribunal finds the collection of service charge for future works lawful, and the absence of challenge on the amount, the amount collected is reasonable.”
On reserve fund contributions
“The Tribunal finds the collection of service charge for future works lawful, and the absence of challenge on the amount, the amount collected is reasonable.”
On reserve fund contributions
“The Tribunal finds the collection of service charge for future works lawful, and the absence of challenge on the amount, the amount collected is reasonable.”
On reserve fund contributions
“The Tribunal finds the collection of service charge for future works lawful, and the absence of challenge on the amount, the amount collected is reasonable.”
On reserve fund contributions
“The interest charges, debt collection fees and costs remain payable in full.”
On legal & professional costs
“The Tribunal is often presented with a situation where the sum charged is excessive for the job or the quality of the job delivered for the sum of money is inadequate.”
Of General observation on cleaning/service charge disputes

This summary is assembled from the structured record of the published decision; amounts appear only where the tribunal stated them. Always rely on the full decision itself.