Decision summary

LON/00AS/LSC/2022/0070 — service charge decision

In LON/00AS/LSC/2022/0070, decided 5 March 2023, the First-tier Tribunal considered 6 disputed service charge items at 20 Marlborough House, 37 Park Lodge Ave, West Drayton and reached a mixed result: 3 items were reduced or disallowed. Full decision on GOV.UK below.

Property: 20 Marlborough House, 37 Park Lodge Ave, West Drayton
Decision date: 5 March 2023
Full decision: Read on GOV.UK

Managing agent named in the decision: First Port Property Services Limited.

What was challenged and what the tribunal decided

ItemDemandedAllowedOutcomeGrounds
Reserve fund contributions (2018)£7,000£7,000Allowed in full—
Reserve fund contributions (2019)£11,000£10,000ReducedCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a)), Landlord could not evidence the cost
Reserve fund contributions (2020)£15,000£10,000ReducedCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a)), Landlord could not evidence the cost
Reserve fund contributions (2021)£15,000£10,000ReducedCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a)), Landlord could not evidence the cost
Gardening & grounds (2021)——Allowed in full—
Other charges (2021)——conceded—

Section 20C order: partial.

Key passages (verbatim)

“It finds that the £7000 demanded in 2018 was reasonable.”
On reserve fund contributions
“for the years in dispute, and in the absence of expert evidence, it finds that £10,000 per annum is a reasonable reserve sum.”
On reserve fund contributions
“for the years in dispute, and in the absence of expert evidence, it finds that £10,000 per annum is a reasonable reserve sum.”
On reserve fund contributions
“for the years in dispute, and in the absence of expert evidence, it finds that £10,000 per annum is a reasonable reserve sum.”
On reserve fund contributions
“the Tribunal finds that the landlord's apportionment falls within its discretionary powers under the lease and is not irrational.”
On gardening & grounds
“During the course of the hearing the applicant conceded that these were payable.”
On other charges

This summary is assembled from the structured record of the published decision; amounts appear only where the tribunal stated them. Always rely on the full decision itself.