Decision summary

LON/00AT/LSC/2021/0446 — service charge decision

In LON/00AT/LSC/2021/0446, decided 19 January 2024, the First-tier Tribunal considered 12 disputed service charge items at 16 Memorial Close, Hounslow, TW5 0LN and found largely for the leaseholder: 12 items were reduced or disallowed. Full decision on GOV.UK below.

Property: 16 Memorial Close, Hounslow, TW5 0LN
Decision date: 19 January 2024
Full decision: Read on GOV.UK

Managing agent named in the decision: HML Shaw.

What was challenged and what the tribunal decided

ItemDemandedAllowedOutcomeGrounds
Administration charges (2019-2021)£646£0Disallowed entirelyNot payable under the lease
Reserve fund contributions (2011)£62.68£0Disallowed entirelyNot payable under the lease
Reserve fund contributions (2012)£68.04£0Disallowed entirelyNot payable under the lease
Reserve fund contributions (2013)£68.04£0Disallowed entirelyNot payable under the lease
Reserve fund contributions (2014)£69.64£0Disallowed entirelyNot payable under the lease
Reserve fund contributions (2015)£69.64£0Disallowed entirelyNot payable under the lease
Reserve fund contributions (2016)£250£0Disallowed entirelyNot payable under the lease
Reserve fund contributions (2017)£250£0Disallowed entirelyNot payable under the lease
Reserve fund contributions (2018)£665.91£0Disallowed entirelyNot payable under the lease
Reserve fund contributions (2019)£660.32£0Disallowed entirelyNot payable under the lease
Reserve fund contributions (2020)£607.78£0Disallowed entirelyNot payable under the lease
Reserve fund contributions (2021)£607.78£0Disallowed entirelyNot payable under the lease

Key passages (verbatim)

“Mr Ahluwalia maintained that there was a lease provision allowing the administration charges to be recovered. There is no such provision.”
On administration charges
“we find that the Applicant is not liable to pay the reserve fund and accordingly none of the disputed sums are due.”
On reserve fund contributions
“we find that the Applicant is not liable to pay the reserve fund and accordingly none of the disputed sums are due.”
On reserve fund contributions
“we find that the Applicant is not liable to pay the reserve fund and accordingly none of the disputed sums are due.”
On reserve fund contributions
“we find that the Applicant is not liable to pay the reserve fund and accordingly none of the disputed sums are due.”
On reserve fund contributions
“we find that the Applicant is not liable to pay the reserve fund and accordingly none of the disputed sums are due.”
On reserve fund contributions
“The Tribunal found him to be a singularly uncooperative individual which was apparently also reflected in his behaviour towards the Applicant and her son.”
Of (HML Shaw)
“It was surprising that this had not been already produced but the Tribunal allowed further evidence which appeared central to the issue in question.”
Of HML Shaw / Respondent

This summary is assembled from the structured record of the published decision; amounts appear only where the tribunal stated them. Always rely on the full decision itself.