Decision summary

LON/00AU/LSC/2021/0091 — service charge decision

In LON/00AU/LSC/2021/0091, decided 14 December 2021, the First-tier Tribunal considered 23 disputed service charge items at 396 St John Street, London, EC1V 4NJ and reached a mixed result: 2 items were reduced or disallowed. Full decision on GOV.UK below.

Property: 396 St John Street, London, EC1V 4NJ
Decision date: 14 December 2021
Full decision: Read on GOV.UK

Managing agent named in the decision: Hurford Salvi Carr Property Management Limited.

What was challenged and what the tribunal decided

ItemDemandedAllowedOutcomeGrounds
Other charges (2018)£3,059.75£3,059.75Allowed in full
Repairs & maintenance (2018)£276.90£276.90Allowed in full
Other charges (2018)£184.60£184.60Allowed in full
Other charges (2018)£500£46.15ReducedApportionment error
Repairs & maintenance (2018)£461.50£461.50Allowed in full
Buildings insurance (2018)£1,509.20£1,509.20Allowed in full
Repairs & maintenance (2018)£215.60£215.60Allowed in full
Other charges (2018)£326.10£326.10Allowed in full
Legal & professional costs (2018)£31.42£31.42Allowed in full
Legal & professional costs (2018)£107.80£107.80Allowed in full
Utilities (2018)£53.90£53.90Allowed in full
Other charges (2019)£3,867.74£3,867.74Allowed in full
Other charges (2019)£267.78£267.78Allowed in full
Other charges (2020)£3,587.52£3,587.52Allowed in full
Other charges (2020)£248.37£248.37Allowed in full
Repairs & maintenance (2020)£276.90£276.90Allowed in full
Repairs & maintenance (2020)£323.40£323.40Allowed in full
Gardening & grounds (2021)£191.98£191.98Allowed in full
Utilities (2021)£1,015.30£0Disallowed entirelyLandlord could not evidence the cost
Buildings insurance (2021)£1,800£1,800Allowed in full
Repairs & maintenance (2021)£369.20£369.20Allowed in full
Repairs & maintenance (2021)£862.40£862.40Allowed in full
Reserve fund contributions (2021)£9,008£9,008Allowed in full

Section 20C order: partial.

Key passages (verbatim)

“the Tribunal finds that these fees are reasonable and payable”
On other charges
“the Tribunal was of the view that the service charges were reasonable and payable”
On repairs & maintenance
“the Tribunal was of the view that the service charges were reasonable and payable”
On other charges
“the total charge was reasonable and payable but this then should be apportioned as in other years on the basis of 9.23% payable by the subject property, making the sum payable £46.15”
On other charges
“the Tribunal was of the view that the service charges were reasonable and payable”
On repairs & maintenance
“the Tribunal accepted that there was no requirement on the landlord to find the cheapest quote and that a market test was made”
On buildings insurance
“it was apparent to the Tribunal that there had been a history of poor accounting and indeed the representative for the respondent confirmed that once employed the company had to clear up a "mess" in regard to the accounts and the service charges.”
Of Respondent (managing agents / prior accounts management)

This summary is assembled from the structured record of the published decision; amounts appear only where the tribunal stated them. Always rely on the full decision itself.