LON/00AY/LSC/2024/0079 — service charge decision
In LON/00AY/LSC/2024/0079, decided 21 August 2024, the First-tier Tribunal considered 6 disputed service charge items at Flat A (Ground Floor), 4 Chancellor Grove, London SE21 8EG and found largely for the landlord: 0 items were reduced or disallowed. Full decision on GOV.UK below.
Property: Flat A (Ground Floor), 4 Chancellor Grove, London SE21 8EG
Decision date: 21 August 2024
Full decision: Read on GOV.UK
Managing agent named in the decision: The Court Group.
What was challenged and what the tribunal decided
| Item | Demanded | Allowed | Outcome | Grounds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Legal & professional costs (2018/2019) | £26 | — | Allowed in full | — |
| Legal & professional costs (2018/2019) | £6 | — | Allowed in full | — |
| Legal & professional costs (2018/2019) | £79.98 | — | Allowed in full | — |
| Legal & professional costs (2019/2020) | £1,344 | — | Allowed in full | — |
| Legal & professional costs (2020/2021) | £950 | — | Allowed in full | — |
| Legal & professional costs (2021/2022) | £750 | — | Allowed in full | — |
Key passages (verbatim)
“The sums demanded by the applicant have been properly and reasonably incurred and to which the respondent is liable to contribute a 1/3 share.”
“The sums demanded by the applicant have been properly and reasonably incurred and to which the respondent is liable to contribute a 1/3 share.”
“The sums demanded by the applicant have been properly and reasonably incurred and to which the respondent is liable to contribute a 1/3 share.”
“The tribunal finds the respondent failed to amplify as to why the sums incurred in respect of accountancy fees were unreasonable or excessive.”
“The tribunal finds the respondent failed to amplify as to why the sums incurred in respect of accountancy fees were unreasonable or excessive.”
“The tribunal finds the respondent failed to amplify as to why the sums incurred in respect of accountancy fees were unreasonable or excessive.”
This summary is assembled from the structured record of the published decision; amounts appear only where the tribunal stated them. Always rely on the full decision itself.