Decision summary

LON/00AY/LSC/2024/0164 — service charge decision

In LON/00AY/LSC/2024/0164, decided 14 November 2024, the First-tier Tribunal considered 3 disputed service charge items at 15B Bloom Grove, West Norwood, London SE27 0HZ and found largely for the leaseholder: 3 items were reduced or disallowed. Full decision on GOV.UK below.

Property: 15B Bloom Grove, West Norwood, London SE27 0HZ
Decision date: 14 November 2024
Full decision: Read on GOV.UK

What was challenged and what the tribunal decided

ItemDemandedAllowedOutcomeGrounds
Buildings insurance (2009-2023)£3,037.20£0Disallowed entirelyDemand formally invalid, Section 20B 18-month time limit
Major works (2022)£1,056.53£562.50ReducedCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a))
Legal & professional costs (2022-23)£138.90£0Disallowed entirelyLandlord could not evidence the cost, Not payable under the lease

Section 20C order: granted.

Key passages (verbatim)

“The outstanding sum of £3,037.20 was not validly demanded and is therefore not payable.”
On buildings insurance
“It is the Tribunal's opinion that the costs of these works are excessive and determined a reasonable sum to be £3,250 inclusive of VAT.”
On major works
“The purpose of the accountancy work is not clear from the text on the invoice nor are the relevance of the associated charges. The Respondent offered no credible supporting evidence to justify their claim that the advice was relevant to the management of the Property and the leaseholders.”
On legal & professional costs
“The Tribunal has some concerns about the independence of Castles FM given they are based at premises associated with the Applicant. We were also told the contractor undertake repair and building work for the Applicant.”
Of Respondent / Castles FM quote
“The Respondent offered no credible supporting evidence to justify their claim that the advice was relevant to the management of the Property and the leaseholders.”
Of Respondent

This summary is assembled from the structured record of the published decision; amounts appear only where the tribunal stated them. Always rely on the full decision itself.