Decision summary

LON/00AY/LSC/2025/0922 — service charge decision

In LON/00AY/LSC/2025/0922, decided 22 January 2026, the First-tier Tribunal considered 13 disputed service charge items at Flat 4, 38 Oakdale Road, London SW16 2HL and reached a mixed result: 1 item was reduced or disallowed. Full decision on GOV.UK below.

Property: Flat 4, 38 Oakdale Road, London SW16 2HL
Decision date: 22 January 2026
Full decision: Read on GOV.UK

What was challenged and what the tribunal decided

ItemDemandedAllowedOutcomeGrounds
Gardening & grounds (2023)£340.16£340.16Allowed in full
Cleaning (2023)£14.25Allowed in full
Administration charges (2023)£36.06Allowed in full
Legal & professional costs (2023)£48.08Allowed in full
Buildings insurance (2024)£1,040£1,040.89Allowed in full
Gardening & grounds (2025)£132.22£132.22Allowed in full
Major works (2024)£7,694£1,849.63Allowed in full
Major works (2024)£8,630£2,074.65Allowed in full
Major works (2024)£15,175£3,648.07Allowed in full
Major works (2024)£10,045£2,414.82Allowed in full
Major works (2025)£6,410£1,540.96Allowed in full
Repairs & maintenance (2024)£1,800£432.72Allowed in full
Administration charges (2024)£1,626.86£0Disallowed entirelyNot payable under the lease, Other grounds

Key passages (verbatim)

“The tribunal determines that the amounts charged to Flat 4 in relation to gardening costs for 2023 are payable and reasonable.”
On gardening & grounds
“The tribunal determines that the sum payable by Flat 4 in respect of the maintenance costs is £14.25 being 24.04% of £60.”
On cleaning
“The tribunal determines that the sum payable by Flat 4 in respect of the admin costs is £36.06, being 24.04% of £150.”
On administration charges
“The tribunal determines that the sum payable by Flat 4 in respect of the Accountant Fees is £48.08, being 24.04% of £200.”
On legal & professional costs
“The tribunal determines that the amount payable for Flat 4 in respect of the insurance for 2024 is £1,040.89, being 24.04% of the insurance sum of £4,329.86.”
On buildings insurance
“The Respondent is keen to see evidence of payments but has agreed that the sum budgeted is reasonable. The tribunal agrees.”
On gardening & grounds
“It is unfortunate that, at the time of the Surrender and Regrant of the lease, the opportunity was not taken to formalise the shares.”
Of Applicant / conveyancing at time of surrender and regrant
“In the future it would be better practice to formalise this arrangement with the preparation of invoices.”
Of Applicant (regarding cash payments to cleaners without formal invoices)
“It is good practice for all service charge expenditure to be evidenced by way of receipted invoices.”
Of Applicant (regarding gardening costs without invoices)

This summary is assembled from the structured record of the published decision; amounts appear only where the tribunal stated them. Always rely on the full decision itself.