Decision summary

LON/00BG/LSC/2019/0224 — service charge decision

In LON/00BG/LSC/2019/0224, decided 28 April 2020, the First-tier Tribunal considered 4 disputed service charge items at Flat 9, Bowden House, Rainhill Way, London, E3 3HZ and found largely for the landlord: 0 items were reduced or disallowed. Full decision on GOV.UK below.

Property: Flat 9, Bowden House, Rainhill Way, London, E3 3HZ
Decision date: 28 April 2020
Full decision: Read on GOV.UK

What was challenged and what the tribunal decided

ItemDemandedAllowedOutcomeGrounds
Major works (2010-11)£18,842.87£18,842.87Allowed in full—
Repairs & maintenance (2010-11)——Allowed in full—
Other charges (2010-11)——Allowed in full—
Other charges (2019)£1,000.49£1,000.49conceded—

Key passages (verbatim)

“the Tribunal awards the Applicant judgement in the sum of £18,842.87 payable by 28 days from service of this decision.”
On major works
“The Tribunal accepted this evidence and found the cost for this item of work to be reasonable. Furthermore, the Respondent had not provided any evidence to demonstrate that the final cost was unreasonable.”
On repairs & maintenance
“The Tribunal, therefore, found that this work had been carried out by the Applicant and the cost was reasonable.”
On other charges
“the Respondent did not appear to dispute the amount and, indeed, on 10 January 2020 it was paid on her behalf. Therefore, the remaining claim only concerned the major works costs.”
On other charges
“the Tribunal noted in paragraph (1) of its Directions order dated 5 November 2019 that the lease does not make provision for contractual costs to be recovered.”
Of Applicant (Poplar HARCA) — costs claim basis unclear; lease does not provide for contractual costs recovery

This summary is assembled from the structured record of the published decision; amounts appear only where the tribunal stated them. Always rely on the full decision itself.