Decision summary

LON/00BJ/LSC/2022/0383 — service charge decision

In LON/00BJ/LSC/2022/0383, decided 28 May 2024, the First-tier Tribunal considered 20 disputed service charge items at Various flats at 21 Plough Road, London, SW11 2DE and reached a mixed result: 6 items were reduced or disallowed. Full decision on GOV.UK below.

Property: Various flats at 21 Plough Road, London, SW11 2DE
Decision date: 28 May 2024
Full decision: Read on GOV.UK

Managing agent named in the decision: Town and City Management.

What was challenged and what the tribunal decided

ItemDemandedAllowedOutcomeGrounds
Repairs & maintenance (2021-22)£10,892£10,892Allowed in full
Buildings insurance (2021-22)£26,055£26,055Allowed in full
Repairs & maintenance (2021-22)£30,759£30,759Allowed in full
Repairs & maintenance (2021-22)£1,108£1,108Allowed in full
Management fees (2021-22)£18,715£18,715Allowed in full
Legal & professional costs (2021-22)£12,200£9,729.75ReducedCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a)), Other grounds
Utilities (2021-22)£12,551£6,300ReducedCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a)), Other grounds
Cleaning (2021-22)£1,344£1,344Allowed in full
Repairs & maintenance (2021-22)£6,056£6,056Allowed in full
Repairs & maintenance (2021-22)£5,593£5,593Allowed in full
Repairs & maintenance (2021-22)£6,479£6,479Allowed in full
Repairs & maintenance (2021-22)£37,479£15,479ReducedCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a)), Other grounds
Other charges (2021-22)£4,650£4,152ReducedLandlord could not evidence the cost, Other grounds
Other charges (2021-22)£1,489£1,489Allowed in full
Other charges (2021-22)£562£0Disallowed entirelyLandlord could not evidence the cost, Other grounds
Other charges (2021-22)£1,092£1,092Allowed in full
Staffing & concierge (2021-22)£42,228£42,228Allowed in full
Administration charges (2021-22)£2,861£2,861Allowed in full
Other charges (2021-22)£334£334Allowed in full
Staffing & concierge (2021-22)£2,160£0Disallowed entirelyCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a)), Other grounds

Section 20C order: refused.

Key passages (verbatim)

“The Tribunal therefore determined that £10,892.00 was payable and reasonable.”
On repairs & maintenance
“The Tribunal therefore found £26,055 payable and reasonable.”
On buildings insurance
“the Applicants did not challenge any specific invoice and therefore the Tribunal found the amount claimed payable and reasonable.”
On repairs & maintenance
“the charge made was therefore reasonable.”
On repairs & maintenance
“the Tribunal found that £18,715 was payable and reasonable.”
On management fees
“The Tribunal has therefore allowed: Accountancy Fee £3,133; Professional Fee £4,100; Office Expense £1,500 + £76.75; Legal Costs £920. Total £9,729.75.”
On legal & professional costs
“This position appeared to be at odds with the evidence given to the Tribunal at the hearing that the £22,000 was actually paid by way of a loan. It was therefore not clear whether or not this loan would be repaid and whether this would be payable by the tenants.”
Of Respondents (Thornsett South London Ltd / Plough Road Management Ltd)

This summary is assembled from the structured record of the published decision; amounts appear only where the tribunal stated them. Always rely on the full decision itself.