Decision summary

MAN/00BN/LSC/2023/0020 — service charge decision

In MAN/00BN/LSC/2023/0020, decided 21 February 2024, the First-tier Tribunal considered 8 disputed service charge items at Apartments at Ladywell Point, Pilgrim's Way, Salford and found largely for the landlord: 0 items were reduced or disallowed. Full decision on GOV.UK below.

Property: Apartments at Ladywell Point, Pilgrim's Way, Salford
Decision date: 21 February 2024
Full decision: Read on GOV.UK

Managing agent named in the decision: Zenith Property Management.

What was challenged and what the tribunal decided

ItemDemandedAllowedOutcomeGrounds
Cleaning (2021)——Allowed in fullLeaseholder evidence insufficient
Gardening & grounds (2021)——Allowed in fullLeaseholder evidence insufficient
Repairs & maintenance (2021)——Allowed in fullLeaseholder evidence insufficient
Other charges (2021)——Allowed in full—
Management fees (2021)——Allowed in fullLeaseholder evidence insufficient
Staffing & concierge (2021)——Allowed in fullLeaseholder evidence insufficient
Other charges (2021)——Allowed in fullLeaseholder evidence insufficient
Reserve fund contributions (2021)——Allowed in fullLeaseholder evidence insufficient

Section 20C order: refused.

Key passages (verbatim)

“The total cost of these entries per leaseholder was £3.76 in the year.”
On cleaning
“Payments to contractors for work usually done by the caretaker are explained by the caretaker's illness during the year.”
On gardening & grounds
“She explained that the repair work done by PT Building Development Ltd which was not adequately described in their invoices, related to making good around the architraves of 246 fire doors which had been repaired or replaced during 2021.”
On repairs & maintenance
“The accrual as a provision for electricity costs since 2016 is permitted by the lease.”
On other charges
“Zenith's management fee, at approximately £125 plus VAT per apartment per year is by no means unreasonable for the level of service provided.”
On management fees
“Other aspects of management, such as health and safety checks and weekly estate manager visits to the site, have been properly charged for as separate services.”
On staffing & concierge
“None of this additional information was supplied by the Respondent prior to the hearing, and none of it was suggested in the letter to leaseholders which accompanied the 2021 service charge account.”
Of Respondent / Zenith Property Management
“The Tribunal has accepted Ms Black's additional evidence, although given the involvement of solicitors and counsel on behalf of the Respondent it is surprising that such relevant information was not previously made available to the Applicants.”
Of Respondent / Zenith Property Management
“The invoices supplied to the Applicants, even when supplemented by copies of Zenith's spreadsheets, were insufficient fully to explain what the Applicants were being asked to pay for. Additional information supplied at the hearing should have been included, at the latest, in Ms Black's witness statement.”
Of Respondent / Zenith Property Management

This summary is assembled from the structured record of the published decision; amounts appear only where the tribunal stated them. Always rely on the full decision itself.