MAN/00BY/LSC/2024/0253 — service charge decision
In MAN/00BY/LSC/2024/0253, decided 2 October 2025, the First-tier Tribunal considered 3 disputed service charge items at Apartment 62, Waterside Apartments, 10 William Jessop Way, Liverpool, L3 1DX and found largely for the landlord: 0 items were reduced or disallowed. Full decision on GOV.UK below.
Property: Apartment 62, Waterside Apartments, 10 William Jessop Way, Liverpool, L3 1DX
Decision date: 2 October 2025
Full decision: Read on GOV.UK
Managing agent named in the decision: Boothman Property Associates Limited.
What was challenged and what the tribunal decided
| Item | Demanded | Allowed | Outcome | Grounds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buildings insurance (2021-22) | £2,803.76 | £2,803.76 | Allowed in full | — |
| Buildings insurance (2022-23) | £819.76 | £819.76 | Allowed in full | — |
| Buildings insurance (2023-24) | £936.02 | £936.02 | Allowed in full | — |
Key passages (verbatim)
“the service charges raised in respect of the buildings insurance for the Property for the period December 2021 to November 2024 are payable and reasonable.”
“the service charges raised in respect of the buildings insurance for the Property for the period December 2021 to November 2024 are payable and reasonable.”
“the service charges raised in respect of the buildings insurance for the Property for the period December 2021 to November 2024 are payable and reasonable.”
“the Applicant has failed to raise a prima facie case to show that the cost of the buildings insurance was unreasonable, having failed to provide any comparable quotes, or indeed any quotes at all, despite having been given the opportunity to file and serve a Statement of Case and supporting documents and / or a response to the Respondent's Statement of Case.”
This summary is assembled from the structured record of the published decision; amounts appear only where the tribunal stated them. Always rely on the full decision itself.