Remus Management Limited — tribunal record

“the Tribunal considered the Respondent's concerns were legitimate and reasonable and that the application to the Tribunal, and any resulting costs, could have been avoided had the Applicant fully engaged with the Respondent's queries regarding his service charge account.”

“The Tribunal did consider that the Applicant should rectify the numbering on the spaces as soon as possible to avoid further confusion.”

“the Tribunal considered the Respondent's concerns were legitimate and reasonable and that the application to the Tribunal, and any resulting costs, could have been avoided had the Applicant fully engaged with the Respondent's queries regarding his service charge account.”

“the Respondent had, since November 2020, been querying the accuracy of the outstanding balance on the service charge account and that at no point did he appear to have received a satisfactory reply to his queries.”

“It would seem that no action was taken until the service of an abatement notice by Luton Borough Council on 21 January 2021.”

“They accept that the works should have been carried out earlier.”

“the tribunal, whilst observing that the respondent had been slow in dealing with the enquiries made by the applicant”

“There would appear to be minor issues with carpet cleaning but clearly there is an issue with pigeons and pigeon mess in the car park. This is an annoying and aggravating issue that really should be addressed quickly before the problem gets worse. It is not reasonable to allow the problem to continue unaddressed.”

“The Tribunal issued a further notice to the Applicant on 8 January 2026, indicating that it was minded to strike out the application for non-compliance with the Tribunal's Directions. This related to the Applicant's agents failing to provide an authority to act and failing to provide confirmation of no objections from leaseholders.”

“The Applicant's agents have estimated the cost of the works at around £2,000 but not provided any information on quotations received.”

“The Applicant says that a notice of intention was issued to all leaseholders but not provided any further information on consultation with leaseholders.”