Decision summary

CAM/42-UD/LIS/2023/0018 — service charge decision

In CAM/42-UD/LIS/2023/0018, decided 30 September 2025, the First-tier Tribunal considered 37 disputed service charge items at 117 & 139A Churchman House, Portman Road, Ipswich and reached a mixed result: 6 items were reduced or disallowed. Full decision on GOV.UK below.

Property: 117 & 139A Churchman House, Portman Road, Ipswich
Decision date: 30 September 2025
Full decision: Read on GOV.UK

Managing agent named in the decision: Block Management UK Ltd / Paul Mather.

What was challenged and what the tribunal decided

ItemDemandedAllowedOutcomeGrounds
Other charges (2021)£12,030£2,670ReducedCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a))
Lifts (2021)£9,413£9,413Allowed in full—
Other charges (2021)£1,896£1,896Allowed in full—
Repairs & maintenance (2021)£515£515Allowed in full—
Repairs & maintenance (2021)£9,855£9,855Allowed in full—
Cleaning (2021)£661£661Allowed in full—
Utilities (2021)£31£31Allowed in full—
Utilities (2021)£3,293£3,293Allowed in full—
Gardening & grounds (2021)£2,885£2,885Allowed in full—
Cleaning (2021)£7,028£7,028Allowed in full—
Buildings insurance (2021)£297£297Allowed in full—
Buildings insurance (2021)£428£428Allowed in full—
Management fees (2021)£797£0Disallowed entirelyDuplication of charges
Other charges (2021)£1,269£1,269Allowed in full—
Other charges (2021)£227£115ReducedCosts unreasonably incurred (s19(1)(a))
Other charges (2021)£101£101Allowed in full—
Administration charges (2021)£240£34ReducedDuplication of charges
Other charges (2021)£600£600Allowed in full—
Administration charges (2021)£669£525ReducedFee excessive for service delivered
Management fees (2021)£7,000£7,000Allowed in full—
Lifts (2022)£3,997£3,997Allowed in full—
Other charges (2022)£402£402Allowed in full—
Other charges (2022)£690£690Allowed in full—
Repairs & maintenance (2022)£16,662£16,662Allowed in full—
Cleaning (2022)£790£790Allowed in full—
Utilities (2022)£30£30Allowed in full—
Utilities (2022)£5,230£5,230Allowed in full—
Gardening & grounds (2022)£2,600£2,600Allowed in full—
Cleaning (2022)£2,873£2,873Allowed in full—
Buildings insurance (2022)£385£385Allowed in full—
Buildings insurance (2022)£428£428Allowed in full—
Other charges (2022)£841£841Allowed in full—
Other charges (2022)£27£27Allowed in full—
Other charges (2022)£473£473Allowed in full—
Other charges (2022)£720£720Allowed in full—
Administration charges (2022)£662£525ReducedFee excessive for service delivered
Management fees (2022)£7,000£7,000Allowed in full—

Section 20C order: refused.

Key passages (verbatim)

“two of the assessments (Michael A Fox Assoc Ltd invoices 247 and 349 totalling £9,360) have been removed from the claim as they relate to cladding. This leaves £2,670 due for the Kendon Safety and Whale Fire Ltd assessments.”
On other charges
“The tribunal considers that the sum of £9,413 is reasonable and payable.”
On lifts
“They are clearly relevant costs reasonably incurred. The tribunal considers that the sum of £1,896 is reasonable and payable.”
On other charges
“No supporting evidence is offered to show that this item of work could be obtained in the marketplace for half of the actual cost recharged. The cost is unremarkable for the works described.”
On repairs & maintenance
“The tribunal considers that the sum of £9,855 is reasonable and payable.”
On repairs & maintenance
“The tribunal considers that the paladin arrangement is a reasonable management decision taken by the claimant which itself comprises the lessees of Churchman House. The tribunal considers that the sum of £661 is reasonable and payable.”
On cleaning

This summary is assembled from the structured record of the published decision; amounts appear only where the tribunal stated them. Always rely on the full decision itself.